Originally posted by ElJamoquio It's not hypothetical, assuming you mean IQ in sharpness.
Again, that's just not true, although I can certainly see how a cursory look at resolution charts and a quick back-of-an-envelope calculation might mislead you into believing that. Try taking some actual images, though, and you'll quickly see that this simplistic view does not hold in reality, and then maybe that would give you the necessary incentive to work out the math for real to see why.
Quote: In terms of lenses, yes. In terms of FF bodies, well if you're comparing camera bodies to equivalent camera bodies within the same manufacturer's base, yes.
Again, if you really had examples, you'd have posted them by now, rather than incomplete charts and bad guesses on how math might work out for sharpness.
Look, if you want to maintain any credibility at all, your next post should be a single line naming the *specific* FF camera and lenses you believe would be an equivalent but smaller / lighter kit than mine. No other words of explanation should be needed. Either the camera and lenses exist, or they don't, and the mere naming of the models should be all the evidence you need.
Quote: But I was doing that to help a stranger who was asking for help on the internet. If instead you're just challenging me, then you can pay my hourly rate if you want me to go any further.
Again, since you are the one that wants this non-existent camera and lenses to turn into reality, I don't see why I should pay you to develop your own dream kit. it doesn't exist right now and will likely never exist, but if you wish to make it exist, by all means, start designing - and maybe someone else who believes it is possible will fund you.