Originally posted by sadsack Here's the discharged readings from last night: This is from a Fully charged set of Eneloops....
Here's the Recharge Readings this morning: (Same batteries in same slots)
Very nice - thank you.
This shows that although the total charge capacity is an indication -
the actual (dis)charge capacity is slightly less.
What the Maha/PowerEX C9000 charges total is different from the actual capacity of the battery -
now with hindsight this is not surprising, as in charging (the system can't be 100% efficient) there must be some losses - eg: heat.
But your readings show that your eneloops (individually) are in good shape.
It used to be that eneloops are delivered (ie: in unopened pack) charged to about 70% capacity -
then there has to be some losses due to the mere time on the shelf/ storage -
so it would be very educational to know what they actually have in capacity taken straight out of the pack.
Anyway a discharge before a charge up is actually good for the batteries, it's a kind of "quick" version of the forming charge.
Now that you've gained statistics of your set of eneloops and new charger
it seems that the batteries are from highest to lowest capacities those that were in slots: 2,3,4,1 for convenience I'll just call them by those numbers ie: (explicitly) b2,b3,b4,b1.
The slots seem to be highest to lowest charge in the order - s3, s2, s4, s1
So I would now use this - b1 in s3; b4 in s2; b3 in s4 and b2 in s1; which may balance things out - however this may have very little practical effect - but it's just my OCD
Oh BTW - this might be a very good reference thread:
Maha MH-C9000 SUPPORT / FAQ Thread
Last edited by UnknownVT; 09-14-2012 at 09:45 AM.