Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-18-2012, 12:43 PM   #16
Pentaxian
Nick Siebers's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,140
I wouldn't anytime soon. Not for over $2,000, and I can't imagine it coming in any less. I would love to use my FA 20-35 on a FF DSLR, but I can always throw it on my ZX-7 with some Velvia - yum.

09-18-2012, 12:54 PM   #17
Senior Member
usmcxm35's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 215
I'm already switching the DA Limiteds with the FA limiteds. Just say the word, FULL FRAME! Don't say Medium Format, $9,000 is quite a ways away from $2,500. GO FULL FRAME!
09-18-2012, 12:55 PM   #18
Loyal Site Supporter
blackcloudbrew's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cotati, California USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,782
In the short term, no, in the long run, maybe.
09-18-2012, 01:10 PM   #19
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,417
QuoteOriginally posted by pixivixio Quote
For $2500 to $3000? Would Pentax FF be able to compete with the Nikon D800? I'm afraid that I rather switch system.

that's the question - would a Pentax 24x36 equal the D800? If so, I'd buy one.

09-18-2012, 01:17 PM   #20
Pentaxian
LFLee's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western MA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,249
~$2000 is my budget for Pentax FF. Since I already have some FF glasses (Need a good zoom like the FA*28-70 or an updated one) though.

with Nikon D600 and Canon 6D, I am evaluating the cost of getting either 1 + a general zoom lens + a 50mm prime. Had to say they are tempting.
09-18-2012, 01:23 PM   #21
Senior Member
topace's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 196
Sure I would. It just bugs me to get less than half of the picture. But it would have to be pretty solid. All-metal construction, Non-crippled lens mount and a reasonable warranty. Give me that and I'll pay $3500.
09-18-2012, 01:28 PM   #22
Moderator PEG Judges
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 30,695
Most definitely I'd have a couple, all my glass is FF compliant and it would save me on multiple systems.
09-18-2012, 01:39 PM   #23
Pentaxian
aleonx3's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,873
I am quite satisfied with the image IQ from k5, don't anticipate that I need a FF unless the price range comes down to near 1 to 1.5k level.

09-18-2012, 02:30 PM   #24
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,181
QuoteOriginally posted by cbaytan Quote
I've always wondered how many of us would buy an FF SLR within a $2500-3000 range.Ok, time to be honest, and give Pentax a good feed-back about the future,
I think most of us already have purchased a FF SLR, but it's in the $25-300 range ... PZ1, LX, K1000, MZ-S ....


But to answer your real question, I think I would buy a FF DSLR, although I'm especially thinking of one priced like a D600 or 6D. To pay $2500-3000 they're really going to have to make it worth my while, by giving it some superior features or performance.

I believe there are a huge number of Pentaxians who could be convinced to buy at $1800-2100, but not at $2700 without some compelling capabilities beyond the mere fact that it's FF.
09-18-2012, 02:30 PM   #25
New Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ashford, Middlesex
Posts: 3
I would!

I would most probably try to buy one as soon as I can afford it. It's going to hurt but I really would like to have a better viewfinder, and shallower DOF, as well as be able to use my 31, 43 and 77 as they were intended. I don't care so much about improved IQ - as far as I'm concerned the IQ is already good enough on a K5. I just happen to like to be able to get that shallow DOF should I want it. I'm sure it's going to be heavier than what I have now (a Samsung GX-20) but I think I can live with that.

If there is no FF from Pentax I will still probably stay with the brand.

My 2 pennies.

Cheers,
Fred
09-18-2012, 02:46 PM   #26
Site Supporter
Ex Finn.'s Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern Maryland.
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,065
I would drop $3k on it, of-course $2500 would be better.
09-18-2012, 02:48 PM   #27
Pentaxian
newmikey's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,461
QuoteOriginally posted by DSims Quote
I believe there are a huge number of Pentaxians who could be convinced to buy at $1800-2100...
I have no idea what you'd base such an assessment on. In the end, a large number of the most vocal pro-FF Pentax shooters seem to want it more in order to "upgrade the status" of Pentax vis-a-vis Nikon/Canon but wouldn't actually pull the trigger. If they had enough money, most would have jumped to any of the contenders a long time ago. Pentax does have a great reputation for "bang for the buck" so the crowd it attracts will, on the average, be somewhat more strapped for cash than the Nikon/Canon community.

I would expect the exact opposite: the numbers wouldn't support production of such a camera and Ricoh understands that.
09-18-2012, 02:52 PM   #28
Veteran Member
RBellavance's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Near Montréal, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,716
Not at that price for sure. *Maybe* if the price ever comes down to 1500$ or lower, but then I'll make a choice based on the whole feature set, not just on the size of the sensor. The current state of APS-C sensor tech is more than enough for my needs.
09-18-2012, 04:26 PM   #29
Pentaxian
bossa's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 4,538
D800 Crop Modes

QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
I'd consider buying an FF just for the being able to get two different FoV's with the same lens. I already carry 3 bodies at times. Having one of the be an FF wouldn't be a problem. Imagine you have the perfect shot on your FA 31, but it's just a little too tight. You switch to your FF and have the equivalent of a 21 but with the 31 optics... instead of changing lenses you change bodies. Seems like a great way to get more out of your system to me.
A good idea that can be achieved with one camera, a D800/E.
I took the following pictures a few minutes ago to serve as an example of what Norm is saying.

Crop modes:
Full Frame NIkkor 35.1.4G


1.2x Crop Mode


1.5x Crop Mode (APS-C)


4x5 Crop Mode


What you save on buying lenses and a second body could finance the body.
09-18-2012, 04:51 PM   #30
Pentaxian
bobmaxja's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Laval, Quebec Canada
Posts: 1,700
NO I would not
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, ff, photography, slr
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A film SLR feels better than a digital SLR ? spystyle Pentax Film SLR Discussion 114 11-08-2014 01:54 PM
Manual SLR lenses on D-SLR or Mirrorless AntonV Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 14 02-09-2012 01:58 PM
Which SLR to buy? Paleki Pentax Film SLR Discussion 5 01-24-2011 01:46 PM
which entry level slr to buy... jensp2m Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 22 05-28-2009 04:08 PM
Anyone looking to buy a Pentax SLR? $245 shipped on sellout.woot today... mwong168 Pentax DSLR Discussion 5 12-22-2008 06:34 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top