Originally posted by Glen_S So, until I can put aside the clams for a good lense, I am going to be using the lense from either my MZ camera's for most of my shooting. I was hoping that the users on this board could make some good suggestions on a good all purpose lense, probably in the 28-300mm range, or perhaps a 28-80mm and a 50-300mm. ...
What would be a good all purpose lense that would take advantages of the capabilities this camera has? I would like variable focal length from 28-300 or so, but if getting two lenses to do this is a better solution then I am open to that as well.
If you are really looking for an all-purpose lens, then you can't do better than either the prize-winning Tamron 18-250 or the Pentax 18-250. I've owned the Tamron and I hear that the Pentax is very similar. I said "have owned," not "own." I sold it. Why? Because I realized that I wasn't using it. I do carry a camera around with me everywhere just for fun, but the truth is, 95% of my shooting involves an assignment or a plan, for which I pick the best lens or lenses available. To be candid, I think limiting yourself to a single lens almost defeats the whole point of having a dslr. Anyway, I just wasn't using the 18-250 much. But that may just be me. If you really want maximum versatility--as if you were carrying around a compact superzoom--then the 18-250 is your #1 option. Note that this lens at 250 is very nearly as long as the Tamron 75-300 at its longest, and I think the quality is as good or better.
I agree that the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 (or the Sigma 28-70 f/2.8) are good mid-range options.
A good alternative to the Pentax kit lens is the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 Macro--but it's not the cheapest option.
Finally, my favorite lens lately for just walking around is the Pentax 35 f/2. Not good for shooting birds on the other side of the lake, but for normal snapshots it's terrific.
Welcome to the forum by the way and congrats on your new camera.
Will