Originally posted by Lowell Goudge not as many as you think. Mount a print and cover some of the too tightly corpped image and you will understand why it is still desireable
100% coverage may not be important to you, but it is still one of the most frequently requested feature of the pro grade Pentax.
Quote: really, what is the difference between having the exposure set differently due to a change in lighting, before shooting, and getting it wrong afterwords. also in many cases the histogram can't resolve high contrast situations....
if you have a K10D you can do this with the last shot you took, so the benefit already exists...
I think this already exists and if you do a preview what is the difference between this and just taking the shot anyway electrons are free.
The difference is user-friendliness and ease of use. Of course, histogram is not magic for all situations, but changing settings while watching the histogram change dynamically is much better and less time consuming than adjusting after the fact or after getting it wrong. And you may miss opportunities while doing the check.
Same for WB - who wants to check each and every shot afterwards? Sometimes, I don't - I would just concentrate on shooting and review the shots only when I take a break.
Just like auto-bracketing, you can, of course, get around it if it does not offer such feature. But having one is so much more convenient.
Quote: no, the monitor is not good enough for that, never will be IMHO
Why would that be? In future, we will have high res monitor. And when you magnify the image to 1:1 pixel representation of the final image, you can get Perfect Focus without much trouble. Much easier to achieve than using Optical viewfinder.
Quote: your right, I don't care
But I am sure many would find all shutter speed flash sync useful.
Quote: In the end, live view is simply a marketing ploy to make people "think" they are getting an easier to use camera.
But you got to admit that most people coming from P&S
prefer live view. It is not simply a marketing ploy; there is huge market demand for such a feature. For people who have not been exposed to 35mm SLR or 35mm P&S, they simply don't care much about optical view finder no matter what optical or ergonomic advantages it may bring.
Quote: Also the view finder approach forces you to concentrate on the ssubject in the lens, and has all of your attention, live view does not achieve this,
It works both ways. Sometimes if you are aware of the whole environment instead of a tunnel vision on your subject, it may give you extra flexibility and opportunities.