Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-02-2008, 01:00 PM   #1
New Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 14
K10D high iso ain't that bad??

because evrybody is talking about high iso stuff on the K20D and comparing it with the K10D high iso, they always say that the high iso is bad or that iso 1600 is unusable, but i think it's oke?? maybe it's because i'm kinda new to the photograpy world but the iso 1600 i took is not all that bad and still pritty good.

take a look

ISO 1600 RAW with sigma 17-70


ISO 1250 RAW with Sigma 17-70



Last edited by Vaizard; 03-02-2008 at 03:21 PM.
03-02-2008, 01:33 PM   #2
Ash
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,679
To me, it's all about getting the right exposure. ETTR, and noise at ISO 1600 will be acceptable in most shots. It's a little hard here because JPEGs for web add more compression, making it hard to see the true noise from the dithering and speckling effect of file compression. But in the end, is ISO 1600 on the K10D usable? Yep, and in fact I use ISO 1000-1600 often, with good results.
03-02-2008, 03:22 PM   #3
New Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 14
Original Poster
i changed the pictures, they where badly shot. now they are a lot better

oh and sorry for the ugly compression.. not my falt.. (stupid web upload thing)

Last edited by Vaizard; 03-02-2008 at 03:27 PM.
03-02-2008, 05:19 PM   #4
PDL
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,142
No EXIF information - just how do we know these are Pentax images?

The Elitist - formerly known as PDL

03-02-2008, 07:12 PM   #5
Veteran Member
palmor's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North of Boston, MA
Posts: 798
QuoteOriginally posted by Ash Quote
To me, it's all about getting the right exposure. ETTR, and noise at ISO 1600 will be acceptable in most shots.
That is what I've been saying for a while now, that I can get very usable shots using ISO 1600 in the K10.. but you have to nail the exposure. My hope with the new sensor is that it has more latitude when you want to PP those high ISO shots to bring out some shadow detail.

Another example of a decent ISO 1600 shot (at least IMO), no PP NR done

Pentax K10D ,Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro
1/10s f/2.8 at 17.0mm iso1600
Ice Hotel photo - palmor photos at pbase.com


There are some others in the that series where the noise is terrible because I tried to lighten up some of the shadows, but since they are mostly to show family and friends our trip I didn't care about posting them
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, iso, k10d, photography, sigma
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
People High iso is not too bad. bergwerk Post Your Photos! 5 09-19-2010 12:06 PM
What does is mean to say the K-7 is "bad" at high ISO? justtakingpics Pentax DSLR Discussion 15 05-19-2010 04:09 AM
K10D vs K7 High Iso Workingdog Pentax DSLR Discussion 11 12-08-2009 08:30 PM
High ISO bad? MoparFreak69 Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 07-21-2009 08:58 AM
Night photography with K10D - High ISO short exposure VS Low ISO long exposure pw-pix Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 02-03-2008 01:37 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:11 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top