Originally posted by WMBP Why did Pentax make the K20D a 14 MP camera? Is anybody clamoring for a 14 MP camera? I regard the extra megapixels as mainly a hard disk space waster. And I assume that, if they'd been content to stop at, say, 12 MP, the camera could have been slightly less noisy. Was the megapixel count just a marketing move? I would find that slightly discouraging. I have enjoyed thinking of Pentax as a company that tended to be more about quality and less about marketing hype than some of the competition.
It may sound as if I'm asking these questions rhetorically, but actually, I'm not. If there's a good reason for the big jump in the megapixel count, I'd like to know what it is.
Will
IMHO 10, 14, 20 mega pixel etc. is just holding technology anyway. In the next 4 years or so the new nanotechnology (much as I hate the term) quantum sensors will be boasting orders of magnitude increases in resolution coupled with iso's several thousand times higher than those around today - more sensitive to light than the human eye.
It stands to reason too - digital photography is now just about or maybe a little better than film - BUT the potential of digital is orders of magnitude better.
Ultimately the aim is to achieve the resolution of the glass - and here we are talking about the wavelength of light as the limiting factor - (lens aberrations can be digitally cancelled)
Of course we need the memory and digital processing technology to match this - but that will come too.
Naturally the initial applications will be in science and top end professional video areas, but eventually they will be incorporated in DSLRs too.
The Luddites amongst us will say who needs this anyway? But really we will be clamouring for it when it comes.