hi all
i used to have a pentax k100d (it got stolen), and now have an insurance claim, and i presume they will let me choose between k100d super or k200d
obviously i know the differences between the two
but just want to know if the negatives of the k200d are less ssignificant than the positives of the k100d
i guess noise is the only factor, i probably prefer the 6mp file sizes (but that's not a big deal)
is there a good gain in having iso 100? i didn't ever shoot at iso 3200, and very rarely at 1600 (i have the af540 so would use that wherever possible)
i'm probably missing some other stuff
just looking at the specs, and it seems stupid not to go for the k200d if i get the choice, is that right? does anyone know if the k200d can control external flashes?
come to think of it, what about the k10d? if that was an option, would it be the better option than the k200d?
the increased buffer would be good (not that i'd use it that much), but bigger viewfinder, me mode, extra dials, although it is larger, and i did really like how the k100d felt (probably a good idea to check out the feel before the final decision)
dave
Last edited by dtra; 03-19-2008 at 04:34 PM.
Reason: updating