Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-15-2013, 12:52 AM - 1 Like   #16
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,767
If you own, or plan to own, a DA*16-50, DA*50-135, DA*200 or DA*300, then you should keep your K10D. Even if you never take another shot with it, having an easy way to bypass the SDM in an otherwise brilliant lens is well worth the storage space.

08-15-2013, 01:10 AM   #17
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelaide.
Posts: 10,202
QuoteOriginally posted by baro-nite Quote
The K10D was the last Pentax (other than the 645D) to use a CCD sensor and for that reason alone I have no intention to part with mine
+1 same here, while the K5IIs does have ISO 80 ( ISO64) option I still prefer the colour rendering obtained from the K10D - especially for IR work.
08-15-2013, 01:28 AM   #18
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,767
...and I agree about the CCD sensor too. I miss the je ne sais quoi of my (long sold) K10D.
08-21-2013, 08:59 PM   #19
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 9,419
I've got a K-5, K-m and a K10D. I use them all....many times carry them all...in my car....on day trips. I usually have my 150-500 Sigma attached to the K-5, 12-24 attached the K10D and 50 F 2.8 Macro attached to my K-m.

Why get rid of a used body that works well. Wouldn't get much dineros for it and I find it useful to have an extra body.

09-05-2013, 05:22 AM   #20
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: outer eastern melbourne, australia
Posts: 402
like others, it's the ccd sensor, imo. i reckon the k10 is a must keep. unique images.
09-05-2013, 06:39 AM   #21
Veteran Member
Andi Lo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,924
Any equipment that's sitting around doing nothing, worth more than $30 and does not act as a good backup (if you actually need one), IMHO should go. The money you get can be used to buy things that you will actually use and will result in actual images.

Unless it's part of a collection, or if you have sentimental attachment with it. (I'm very guilty of this) DA 40 oh DA 40!

As someone mentioned above, having more than one body to an outing is actually really nice. Rather than changing lenses, you change bodies! I use the cotton carrier system and it's very convenient to carry >1 body and keep your hands free
09-05-2013, 07:00 AM   #22
Pentaxian
ducdao's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal/Vermont
Posts: 2,160
My k10D is dedicated to MF lenses. It has over 20K shutter actutations and still going strong and I'm not going to sell it.
09-05-2013, 07:07 AM   #23
Senior Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Grand Rapids
Photos: Albums
Posts: 193
I had a K200d which i think used the same or about the same sensor as the K10d. it sure has a neat way that it renders photos at low iso. It was brutal going up to 800 or past, when i went to the sony A580 i was just mind blown that i could shoot iso 6400 and get clean images full of detail. If money were no object id probably keep one around as an artifact / conversation piece sitting on a shelf or to play with once in awhile -- but lenses are expensive and id use that money towards a newer body, lens, etc.

DSLR will not gain in value, a few more years and these things might be $50 on craigslist like a film camera.

09-05-2013, 07:50 AM   #24
Veteran Member
p38arover's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Western Sydney, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,084
I understand where you are coming from. When I moved up from the *istD to the K100D, I passed the *istD to my daughter. When I upgraded to the K-7, I retrieved the *istD and gave my daughter the K100D.

I plan to use the *istD for macro photography with my screw-mount lenses and the bellows that I bought for my Spotmatic. That way it can stay set up for that work.

Now I have a K-5 so have been using the K-7 as a second body albeit rarely.

But..... another thread on here has made me reconsider how I use it. See https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/235886-re-purposin...t-bookend.html

The K-7 is, as of tonight, set up for B&W shooting with one of my early K-mount MF prime lenses.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, k-01, k10d, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it worth selling Tamron 28-75 for... HoBykoYan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 02-17-2012 10:09 PM
selling 16-45mm and 55-300 mm & getting 18-135 is it worth it? nirVaan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 19 08-09-2011 04:46 PM
My optio w30...is it worth selling? Loren E Pentax Compact Cameras 5 02-09-2011 11:50 PM
K100D to K10D -- is it worth it? Erik Pentax DSLR Discussion 22 03-28-2010 09:27 AM
k10D Is an upgrade worth it? emptydam Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 11-11-2007 04:18 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top