Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-14-2013, 12:14 PM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
Pentax K-30

For all of those who purchased a Pentax K-30 before it was discontinued, what are your thoughts on it being discontinued?

10-14-2013, 12:27 PM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 43,143
The K-50 is virtually identical to the K-30, so I wouldn't consider it discontinued

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

10-14-2013, 01:36 PM   #3
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
Original Poster
I'm taking your word for it. I'm getting the K-50 soon.
10-14-2013, 01:50 PM   #4
Site Supporter
rbefly's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Denver, Colorado
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,030
Higher Number?

Hello J Andre, Welcome to the Forum!
I agree with Adam, it's more like the K-30 was superceded or replaced by the K-50. The only differences I could find on the comparison chart (and they're tiny, overall) is that the K-50 adds one stop of sensitivity to the expanded range (ISO 51200 vs ISO 25600 for the K-30) and accepts a Wi-Fi card in addition to the SD, SDHC and SDXC cards of the K-30. Otherwise, they're virtually identical in performance, specs and features. Somewhat different in appearance, however much that matters!
For a real upgrade, you might wait and see what the user reviews have to say about the K-3. On paper, it looks like a major advance.
JMO,
Ron

10-14-2013, 02:02 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Kobayashi.K's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 324
The K-30 is not discontinued.
You can check which camera's are discontinued on the Ricoh website:
Products | RICOH IMAGING
10-14-2013, 02:32 PM   #6
Senior Member
delegopa's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 244
I really like the design of the K-30 and had hoped for similar forms in the future. Looking at K3/50/500 lets me assume they will stay with the old established design. But as long as my K-30 makes it's clicks I don't need to worry about that.
10-14-2013, 03:20 PM   #7
Veteran Member
Dr_who's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 690
All cameras are discontinued eventually. Most people will buy the K3 before it's discontinued too.
10-14-2013, 04:06 PM   #8
Site Supporter
JimJohnson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Superior - Michigan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,271
I sold a purchased new K-r and a couple lenses, and added a little cash to purchase a lightly used K-30 with 18-135. I wasn't so much displeased with the K-r as much as a wanted a few of the K-30's features. It was a great decision. How do I feel about the K-50? Neutral. Like the above posters have said, there are very few differences and while all of them are nice, they aren't enough to make me switch. The K-50 should have been named the K-30II and the K-500 the K-300. It also would have pulled the entire line into place 3, 30, 300 instead of 3, 50, 500.

10-14-2013, 04:44 PM   #9
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 27,452
QuoteOriginally posted by rbefly Quote
Somewhat different in appearance, however much that matters!
For the record, I prefer the K-30 look...gonzo!


Steve
10-14-2013, 11:07 PM   #10
Senior Member




Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 161
you can still get the K-30 from Hunts photo for $500 with the WR lens. I would save the extra 200 or so and get that instead of the K-50... use that $200 for $20 warranty card or even a Rokinon 85mm 1.4 ($250 new in amazon)
the link is in PF in the price watch section.
10-15-2013, 11:52 AM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 402
from what i can tell from the reviews, the K-50 has better video auto-focusing and higher ISO capabilities. Basically , aside from body styling and color choice those are the only differences. I like the K-30 body style over that of the k-50, but im weird.
10-15-2013, 04:16 PM   #12
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 6
Oldnoob,

It is funny that you mention it but I happen to find the K-30 also more beautiful than the K-50. In fact it was the sole reason why I got interested in this cool looking camera. Later I found out all the benefits of Pentax over the Nikon 3200 that I was looking at initially.

I think people new to Pentax like the K-30 look more and find it more distinctive for Pentax than K-50 design.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, k-30, pentax, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax K 30 vbasia Pentax K-30 & K-50 7 07-26-2013 01:58 AM
Pentax K-30 problems. Mr. A.S. Pentax K-30 & K-50 33 01-25-2013 09:11 AM
For Sale - Sold: Pentax K-30 with Sigma 50-150 f2.8, Sigma 30 f1.4 metalmania Sold Items 7 12-14-2012 12:59 AM
Korean K-30 Focus-Peaking Test (and Overall K-30 Review) Welfl Pentax K-30 & K-50 8 08-23-2012 01:06 PM
Pentax K-30 Specifications Adam Pentax K-30 & K-50 113 07-08-2012 09:03 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top