Originally posted by subsea The Gnat which was actually built is shown in flight in the second picture.
The Folland Gnat! A true classic. As a little kid in the late sixties/early seventies I remember seeing some great Red Arrows displays when they were using those planes. In those days they could display right over the crowd's heads, and the effect was mindblowing. But unfortunately, with modern-day ultra-paranoid safety regulations, they have to fly so far away that the displays aren't anywhere near as spectacular. My longest lens is the F 100-300mm, which I'll be using at the weekend, and even at 300mm I know I'll have to crop heavily.
Here's a curious camera discovery though. It turns out that at ISO settings up to 400, my GX-10 cropped from 10MP to 5MP has less noise than my K-S1 cropped from 20MP to 10MP. So effectively, at lower ISO and as long as I'm not cropping more than 50%, the 10MP sensor is better than the 20MP. It's only above ISO 400 that the K-S1 starts to have a real advantage.
Edit:
I thought I'd better add that this was not a scientific test under controlled conditions. It's based on similar airshow shots with both cameras with the same lens in similar light conditions (clear blue sky). I made straight raw to jpeg conversions of various shots in camera raw, cropped them all by the same percentage, and compared the amount of visible noise at full screen on my monitor. It's the noise at full screen on my monitor or in a 12"x18" print that I'm personally interested in. I'm not a 100% crop kinda guy.