Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Closed Thread
Show Printable Version 12 Likes Search this Thread
02-06-2014, 11:50 AM   #31
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 161
Original Poster

Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.


QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
You won't find a better lens for the money..... actually, you won't find a betterr lens for twice the money.











Slide show

It was a sad day when I realized my wife had pretty much adopted it. Leaving me to eventually buy a Sigma 70 macro, that while a very nice lens, was more money for almost the same thing.

K-5 Tamron 90+ 1.7 TC


And 1:1 pixel peeper, your K-5IIs would be even sharper.

How does it work for non macro? I notice you have a few shots there but I don't really shoot a lot of macro. none really.

02-06-2014, 11:58 AM   #32
Veteran Member
Wired's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,519
oh yes, the Tammy 90mm f2.8 is a bloody awesome lens, especially for the price. I wish I never sold mine. However I never used it much as I didn't like the focal length as much on my APSC. but I wouldn't think the Tammy would be incredibly useful for live music. It's too long a prime to use in the pit in my opinion.

That said, even in non-macro the Tammy is sharp edge to edge like all macro lenses even wide open. The big issue I had with it is the focus hunting.... it would constantly rack in and out trying to figure things out, even when doing non-macro work. the focus throw is huge too. It's a cool lens no doubt and if you can't afford the DFA 100mm Pentax Macro it's a no brainer. But I wouldn't buy it to delay the purchase of a telephoto zoom, especially for your purposes. In fact I would buy a tele f2.8 zoom over this lens any day of the week if I was shooting music.

I agree, f2.8 lenses or better is the only way to go for live music shooting.

If your doing live music, this guy's videos and instructions are invaluable... he's also kinda funny: Tips for Taking Photos | Photography Tip | How To for Photographers there was a RAWtalk episode he did (2 parter) on live music photos and I found tons of helpful info in it. He also has a video where mounted a Contour camera on his hotshoe while he was shooting a band in the pit. It was actually pretty cool.
02-06-2014, 12:02 PM   #33
Moderator
Man With A Camera
Loyal Site Supporter
Racer X 69's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Great Pacific Northwet, in the Land Between Canada and Mexico
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,077
QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote

Great shots as always Norm. I especially like this one. Very nice.
02-06-2014, 12:08 PM   #34
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,451
QuoteOriginally posted by rzarector Quote
How does it work for non macro? I notice you have a few shots there but I don't really shoot a lot of macro. none really.
When you get a macro lens for non-macro work, you need to use the limiter so it doesn't search the whole range of the lens for a focus point. So a little more complicated than it needs to be, apart from that it's fine.

A couple of landscapes...






We did a comparison of our lenses that do 90mm once and it was the winner over the DA*60-250 at 90mm, based on equal resolution, but slightly better micro-contrast...

And it's not bad for large animals, the guy I bought mine from used it for bears, although, I tend to like 400mm for bears myself.


QuoteOriginally posted by Racer X 69 Quote
Great shots as always Norm. I especially like this one. Very nice.
Thanks Racer

QuoteQuote:
The big issue I had with it is the focus hunting.... it would constantly rack in and out trying to figure things out, even when doing non-macro work.
On the K-3 it's a dream, that issue is completely gone, the speed of AF on the K-3 is remarkable, on a K-5IIs, I don't know what it would be like.


Last edited by normhead; 02-06-2014 at 12:14 PM.
02-06-2014, 12:09 PM   #35
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
TER-OR's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dundee, IL
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,699
From what I've read that 70-200 is a nice piece of kit.

I think you have a good plan set out now.
02-06-2014, 12:28 PM   #36
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,451
QuoteOriginally posted by TER-OR Quote
From what I've read that 70-200 is a nice piece of kit.

I think you have a good plan set out now.
I'd just hate to be using a long heavy zoom on a K-01. I'll use a K-01 with a long lens if it's on a tripod with the lens on the tripod, not the camera, if it's going to be hand held, forget it.

If going the 70-200 2.8 route, how about the Tamron 70-200 at $650

With a K-50


But, I'll warn you, those big zooms are bitch to carry. Before I bought my DA*60-250, someone told me carrying big zooms will ruin your life and make you miserable. There's been many a time I wished I would have listened to him. And there's been other times I was glad I ignored him.
02-06-2014, 12:33 PM   #37
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
TER-OR's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dundee, IL
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,699
QuoteOriginally posted by normhead Quote
But, I'll warn you, those big zooms are bitch to carry. Before I bought my DA*60-250, someone told me carrying big zooms will ruin your life and make you miserable. There's been many a time I wished I would have listened to him. And there's been other times I was glad I ignored him.
I can concur. I rented a 60-250 for an airshow to use on my K10. The total kit was over 5lbs, which was not fun to cart around. It turned out to be a drizzly day, so the weather sealing was nice but the photos were still disappointing (all low-contrast).

I do enjoy hiking around with the 55-300, though, it's pretty light. It really does depend on how you plan to use the equipment.

02-06-2014, 12:36 PM   #38
PEG Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland... "Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand" - William Blake
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 57,867
QuoteOriginally posted by rzarector Quote
You have 1100 to spend...what do you do?
Put down a deposit on a Leica M9, oops wrong forum.
02-06-2014, 12:53 PM   #39
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 161
Original Poster
PULLED THE TRIGGER!!!

K-5iis for 699 total, including shipping and taxes (there were none)!!!! PUMPED!!

Leaving me 450 saved for a lens down the road.

I hear you on the heavy aspect. But in the concert world, that lens is a must. I must have a fast zoom to get in close from venues that don't allow that to occur.

The pentax 30-150 lens is too pricey for what i think its worth. I liked it, but it was pricey new. the tammy looks and sound great. I hear its sharp and affordable.
I don't have any Tammys yet so this may be a good first dip. Possibly I'll pick up one used on here, saw one went for just over 550 not too long ago.

Thank you all for your help. I really do appreciate it. I think I'm overdue for donating to the site after all this help I have been getting.

Pentax for life yo! ...uh.....or Ricoh for life yo....whatever.
02-06-2014, 12:58 PM   #40
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 161
Original Poster
Woohoo!
Attached Images
 
02-06-2014, 12:58 PM   #41
Pentaxian
gazonk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oslo area, Norway
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,746
QuoteOriginally posted by rzarector Quote
PULLED THE TRIGGER!!!

K-5iis for 699 total, including shipping and taxes (there were none)!!!! PUMPED!!
Good choice - and what a bargain! The K-5 is a great concert camera with its super silent shutter, just don't forget to turn off that annoyingly strong AF light when you're at a dark venue
02-06-2014, 01:04 PM   #42
Veteran Member
Wired's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,519
I think the big thing people need to remember with the lens recommendations is the OP's original intent and goals as a photographer. We are hearing things that are not usually considered useful for his shooting style.

The typical shooter in a live music venue pit has a high fps camera capable of low light auto focus and good/great noise handling with 3 lenses, a fast wide zoom, fast normal zoom, and a fast tele zoom. Or at fast wide prime and a fast normal zoom, or a fast normal zoom and fast tele zoom.

I would say the ultimate Pentax kit would be: Sigma 10-20 F3.5, Sigma 18-35mm f1.8, Pentax DA*50-135mm f2.8 with a Pentax K3 and a pair of Thinktank.



edit: great choice! K5IIs is a beauty!
02-06-2014, 01:19 PM   #43
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,451
Good luck with your choice, that's a great camera.
02-06-2014, 01:22 PM   #44
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
TER-OR's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dundee, IL
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,699
I think the K5II has plenty of ISO to play with in concert venues. I'd love to play around with the Tammy 70-200 just to see how well it works, and if you get a used one you can resell it for the same price, I'm sure.

The one thing to be careful of - again, no direct experience on my part - is the LED light systems now - they can screw with light meters or essentially overexpose certain colors. There are some threads about this. I don't know if RAW will do enough to compensate, I think it's inherent to the limited-wavelength light - unlike gels on old incandescents.
02-06-2014, 01:55 PM   #45
Veteran Member
Wired's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,519
QuoteOriginally posted by TER-OR Quote
I think the K5II has plenty of ISO to play with in concert venues. I'd love to play around with the Tammy 70-200 just to see how well it works, and if you get a used one you can resell it for the same price, I'm sure.

The one thing to be careful of - again, no direct experience on my part - is the LED light systems now - they can screw with light meters or essentially overexpose certain colors. There are some threads about this. I don't know if RAW will do enough to compensate, I think it's inherent to the limited-wavelength light - unlike gels on old incandescents.
I think the iis is just fine for live music. 6400 isn't terrible and quite usable on that camera. I normally use auto white balance. I would try manual WB and change the temp manually for the LED lights?
Closed Thread

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
body, camera, dslr, lens, photography

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are your most used lens and what do you use them for? What lens do you have that pearsaab Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 55 01-26-2021 03:13 PM
What lenses/gear do you still have from when you started? ChooseAName Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 54 05-27-2013 08:51 AM
What smart phone do you have? JenniferLeigh General Talk 52 09-14-2012 12:59 PM
What lighting conditions do you do to calibrate your lenses? LeDave Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 07-30-2012 12:04 PM
Camera collection-what do you have + how do you show it? lesmore49 Photographic Technique 23 05-26-2009 10:43 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top