Originally posted by Clavius And the SR system has been blurring pictures since it was first introduced.
The SR system has saved many more photos for me than it's ruined. I can get fairly sharp handheld photos with slow shutter speeds.
Originally posted by monochrome What did the iPod and iTunes do to the audio equipment business? That might be a kind of guide to what is coming.
(wow, I wound up writing more below than I expected. It's not all in direct response to the quote.)
The iPod is for the consumption of content while cameras create content, so I don't know how well the comparison holds. Cell phones changed photography because of their displays as well as their included cameras.
Ubiquitous display screens have transformed photography. When film was king, paper was the medium for viewing photos. Most photos today are only seen on 2mp computer and phone screens; good cameras capture better data than many display devices are capable of showing. Not many people will be printing large photos from their cell cameras, and does anyone need a 16+mp photo with good dynamic range and low noise if it's only going to be viewed on a 2mp screen?
Then there's the impact of the internet. A photo can be shared worldwide seconds after it's taken. In the olden days, a photojournalist would submit their photo to an editor, the editor would have to like it, then readers would have to wait for the newpaper or magazine to be printed and shipped.