Hi to everyone
I am having a bit of a conundrum and since I spend more time crawling ebay and pentax forums than anything else, I decided to finally create an account here and ask the questions that bother me.
Short bio:
I've been a sort of enthusiast since I got my first digital P&S in 2000 (Mustek 0.8 MP). I went through several progressively better cameras until I got my first (and only so far) DSLR in 2007; K100D Super. I went through all the common phases; experimented with plethora of manual possibilities, switched to RAW, got the tripod, got the second zoom (50-200), got the flash (Metz 58 AF-2).... and then with time slowed down to shooting only family events with 18-55 and flash if needed.
So recently I was digging through cupboards and found a couple of ancient manual lenses my father gave me long time ago. One was a Pentacon 300mm I remember I found impossible to focus and steady shooting from hand. The other one was Carl Zeiss Jena Biometar 80mm 2.8 I never really tried to use. So I did. I shot a couple of indoor portraits without flash in medium to low ambient light.
As you can guess, I was thoroughly impressed by the results compared to kit lens bland (when there is ample sunlight) to unusable (when there is not) shots. So as a first step I promptly ordered Pentax M 50mm 1.7 as it was a) cheap b) presumably in better shape than my poor Biometar that won't focus further than 5-7m away (focus ring gets stuck).
Then the itch started to grow... but you know that story. In short, I've looked into every Pentax lens that can be got for less than 300-400 EUR (and I peeked above).
However, dreams about ~1000EUR Limiteds are one thing, and financial reality is something else. I am at a fairly common crossroad of having enough money for a body or a couple of reasonably good lenses.
The common sense says to get good glass as the bodies come and go. On the other side, sensors and electronics have progressed pretty much since 2006, so what was not really tempting (K10D, K20D) became really really so (K5, K5 II). Anyway.
After 7 years I believe I know pretty well what bothers me with what I have.
Camera:
1) Autofocus is slow and erratic except in ideal conditions. It is really hard to capture the moment if not in a good light and relatively close.
2) In low light, ISO200 won't do, ISO400 is bearable but recognizably lower quality, ISO800 is pretty much useless shot from hand.
3) Writing to card is really slow. Second shot is slower, third will not happen when needed.
4) Battery life not really great; if I don't pack extra I usually finish with photography sooner than expected.
5) No ISO button is not too much of a problem considering limited applicability (see 2) but would be nice to have.
Lenses (kit 18-55 & 50-200)
1) Both slow; I haven't made a single low light photo I like (not counting tripod use), quality wise
2) 50-200 struggles to focus, very soft on long end
3) 18-55 produces washed out photos in bright sunlight (polarizing filters change the atmosphere too much, the photos turn out ok, but it's not 'it')
4) 18-55 distorts faces too much when shooting indoors (birthdays and such)
5) consequently, can't get 5 people in frame using 50-200
6) have to use flash (bounced or not) for pretty much all indoor shooting; can't get that relaxed look from people waiting to be stroboshocked.
As I don't have firsthand experience with newer Pentax gear (or quality lenses for that matter), I would like to hear from people that have experience with K5 / K5 II and (if there are such) people shooting K100D Super with better lens. Do you recognize any of the issues I perceive I have, what changes or not when moving to better body/ better lens? I read somewhere that most of my issues with low light, ISO quality and slowness would be more cheaply remedied with a newer body than a number of expensive lenses.
I didn't mention K-30/K-50 as from what I gathered in my neck of the woods their prices are comparable or higher than K 5 and for some reason I believe I'd be better of with K 5 instead. But I 'm not sure that autofocus of K5 II is worth 350EUR difference. Or that I'll like being stuck with K5 II body, two kits and M 50mm 1.7. Or that DA 70 Limited won't do much for my gripes with K100D. Or...
Well, I wrote it. Thanks for reading.
Now shoot me.