Originally posted by carrrlangas Anyway, If the impact was so strong to damage the polycarbonate of the body, Iīd rather that over a larger lens taking such impact... Look the brighter side: You are lucky you didnīt have a longer lens mounted, it would have broken and much more expensive to repair (or replace depending on damage) than the body of your camera!
I have to agree w/ carrlangas' comments here. I once dropped my K-5 with a large Sigma superzoom mounted on it. It was in a padded bag and I only dropped the bag about 1 foot, maybe even less. But it landed just right to bend the lens mount on the body. There was no visible damage to the body or lens whatsoever; just the mount was slightly bent. My point is, that the lens mount is the most vulnerable part on the DSLR, because it is the only part that has to be critically and optically aligned, which is also vulnerable to damage from a minor fall. Having a magnesium alloy body or bigger lens would probably just stress the mount more.
Also, you can reap some benefits to upgrading your body to newer technology after several years, whereas a good lens is always a good lens.
Sorry for the trouble, and good luck.