Originally posted by KrisK10D But 1/6th
That's really cool
Why is everybody so easily excited?
blur-free, noise-free is a no-brainer for a web-sized image. The originals are probably more impressive.
But as I said over and over again, web-sized images cannot show that an original is good with regard to noise and blur.
My own experiments with a K20D with active SR show that at 50mm, original exposures show sufficient lack of blur at 1/8s and shorter (about 8 pixels blur region, but with mild blur intensity(*) only
)
(*) See my attachments, a representative example :
- subject at web resolution (full image at this magnification would have been 700px wide)
- subject at 100% crop
- subject digitally corrected for 8px wide motion-blur afterwards
Blur w/o SR is equally distributed within the blur region (and can be corrected). The blur is strongly visible. Blur with SR is smaller
and more mild (more centered around the correct location) but heavier to correct for. The blur is weakly visible.