Originally posted by stevebrot I laughed a little when I read about the hyperlapse video. There are so many complaints about the similar feature on the K-3.
Steve
Originally posted by pacerr I don't believe you can call Pentax's SR a gyroscope-driven system. There are limitations as what could be accomplished with SR compared to actual gyros.
The reason why I even made the post is that, with in-body stabilization (SR), Pentax already has 2D (X and Y axis) sense and measurement capabilities. There are additional functionalities that could provide differentiation. Pentax has stated several time that they are looking to differentiate their products from the rest of the market. Actual implementation is dependent upon the end result that they would want to achieve and the architecture / design employed. I haven't used a K3, so I can't comment on the hyperlapse video.
If you are going to go the trouble of implementing some new capability, you need to at least make it very useable and bullet proof.