Originally posted by monochrome Do you know for a fact that Sony makes different sensors, one 'cheaper' than the other?
Do you know for a fact (should Sony actually have changed their sensor or offered a different one - and should Pentax have changed the sensor) that the alleged new sensor isn't BETTER and MORE EXPENSIVE (and therefore LESS profitable) than the other sensor?
If you don't know these things then this is an unfounded thought and an irresponsible post.
Well.... I think the other two gave you a pretty good answer....
However, Since you have no information pertaining to my actual question in your answer(?)
I will point out that you should probably check your facts before you attack me personally! To quote myself "is the older one better or worse than the new one?"
is it BETTER or WORSE.... So to sum it up, all you provided was an unfounded thought and an irresponsible answer.
If there has been a change and the (wait, just calling my lawyer to form sentence correctly) alleged (by me) sensor and/or parts and/or other components (not stating that there has been a change but if) is/are not the same. Would it be better to purchase an used older body or a brand new, newer body?
Although now i realize that instead of calling the lawyer i could have ordered a K3 instead for the same amount of money, with or without the new (alleged) sensor.... hindsight is 20/20 i guess