Originally posted by Neville I have a Pentax K-5II camera and two zoom lenses (18-135mm and 55-300mm) and three prime lenses (50mm 1.7, 100mm macro 2.8 WR and 300mm 4.5).
One of my growing interests has been sports photography, and I have been using my prime lenses primarily (excuse the pun), as I find the IQ of prime lenses generally far superior to that of zoom lenses. The obvious sacrifice has been lack of flexibility, especially in sports where the players rapidly move further and closer from and to me.
So now I have decided to get a second camera body, so that I can attach a prime lens of a different focal length to each body.
The question is: which body should I get? Should I get another K-5II or should I get a K-3?
I also use only primes and 2 bodies. I've found that having 2 bodies with different button layouts can be slightly confusing sometimes, especially if you're used to pressing buttons while looking through the viewfinder without actually looking at them. You get used to one camera, then grab the other and subconsciously feel for the 1st camera's buttons. It's not a big issue, but 2 matching bodies makes it much more simple to just pick one up and shoot. Just a thought.
Originally posted by PentaxRev between the K-5ii and K-3 should be a big deal. Most of the controls are very similar.
Not if you use back button focusing.