Originally posted by Rene` If you have a K20D --- I would love to hear from you. I shoot children and sports.
I'm sorry, but it's against my moral principles to give advice to someone who shoots children.
Please pardon the awful (and probably
repetitively awful) joke. It's Saturday night, and I've started hittin' the sauce! Haha!
Now, to get to your actual question... I own the K20D, and I absolutely LOVE it.
That said... it's my first digital SLR, so I don't have anything close to compare it to, necessarily. I was a Pentaxian before I even knew I was a Pentaxian. I borrowed a 35mm Pentax point-and-shoot from my sister before my first trip to Europe in 1998, and I still love those pictures. My 2nd digital was a Pentax Optio 550 -- which took/takes amazing pictures... although I've since abandoned it for a more portable point-and-shoot (Casio).
I'm still a relative novice to SLRs (although I have a pretty solid grasp of the photographic fundamentals, and have owned a Minolta XTSi + Tamron 28-200 for about 10 years). I've found the Pentax K20D to be really enjoyable, and I'm really pleased with the pictures so far. I'll let people correct me if they disagree, but I think the only reason to
not get a K20D (vs. a K10 or K200) is the price. That much may be obvious.
I don't shoot sports, so I can't offer much feedback in terms of "speed of use," burst mode, etc... but for children / portraits, etc, this thing is awesome. My best portraits have come from my 100mm Macro, fwiw.
I have the battery grip, with extra battery, of course, and I've never come close to running out of juice in the field. I imagine that most would be well-served by two batteries, with only the most extreme cases needing a 3rd battery (which I do have).
Hope that helps... let me know if you have any more specific ?s.
-J