Originally posted by simon_199 I recently upgraded from K200D to K-3, and my advice would be to do the same. However that strongly depends on your needs. In my opinion, at current pricing a K-3 body as a way higher price/performance ratio compared to the K-S2, unless of course a flip screen and WiFi is really important to you. But if you are comfortable with the size and features of the k200d like the top LCD i'd go with the K-3.
In my opinion this is the best time to pick a K-3 as it's a top of the line APS-C model with all the features that a flagship deserves. It is "old" but only in the sense that it is at the end of its production cycle, thus relatively cheap, but still extremely competitive on all areas. Again, unless for some reason your kind of shooting would benefit from built-in wifi connection and a tilt screen.
+1 to me, K3 is clearly the winner at a sometwhat reasonable price.
In term of possibilities/capabilities newn we are there:
K-S1 < K50 < K5-IIs < K-S2, K3, K3-II
that's counting K-S1 is not that interresting (no WR, lack 2 wheel to control the camera...) and not really cheaper than K50.
K5-IIs is K50 with a bit better AF in low light and sharper image at 100% crop due to lack of low pass filter.
K-S2 is a K5-IIs with 20MP instead of 16, a fully orientable screen
K3 or K3-II lack the fully orientable screen but the AF is much much better allowing to focus accurately on all focus point with great precision and speed. It is also 24MP and due to it lack of low pass filter, it provide at low iso as much detail as a D60/D610 full frame cameras while still being APSC. Like K5-IIS it is the "pro" line so it is made for taking 200 000 pictures, built really like a tank while staying relatively compact.
To me, the best offerings are K-50 for a good body at a bargain and K3 for the level of features while still keeping a good price.