Originally posted by sholtzma As I presently understand exposure compensation, if you shoot in Program or aperture priority or shutter priority (or any other mode in which the camera can set one or more of the settings), the camera will vary the aperture or shutter speed or ISO when you set exposure compensation. This would be why a Canon camera I saw the other day would not allow exposure compensation when set on Manual. But, my K5iis allows for exposure compensation even when in manual mode. Setting the exposure compensation to, say, +1, did not change any of the aperture/shutter/ISO settings either in camera or in the EXIF afterwards. This leads to the question, how is exposure compensation working when the photographer controls all of the exposure triangle?
Exposure compensation in manual is, or I should say was, a debated issue at the onset of the K Series DSLRs.
I started with an *istD, which allowed for exposure compensation in manual, and this was useful as you can imagine, if you have an exposure error, that is always persistent, on a lens, then even in manual you want to zero out the error, BUT, the K10D, and I believe later cameras, does not use the exposure compensation in manual even if you dial it up. Somebody thought, manual is manual, why, would you ever want to have an automated compensation in manual.
I think they were wrong, in the same manner as those same programmers who decided at the onset of the K5 that insulated lens mounts = no lens installed, hence no diaphragm activation.
Unfortunately, the changes have been made, gradually making the cameras in some regards less useful.
RICOH ARE YOU LISTENING TO THIS?