Originally posted by beachgardener SR I think is convenient, a back stop that works well, but not a substitute for good technique ie. camera on tripod, where this is possible.
I tried the -$200 tripods and with a windy day my hands + SR are steadier. I can't afford a more expensive tripod at the moment. Unless you guys have suggestions on a good tripod for $200.
Originally posted by hjoseph7 I never buy a new product when it first comes out until the dust has settled and they get all the bugs out. I had a chance to get the K3 but opted for the K-5II because it had been out for a while. of course this does not solve your case...
I always did that with MS Windows
but I didn't know that it applies to cameras too. I guess I'll start doing that.
Originally posted by Medomare Greets,
yesterday I have put my new K3 II (bought in may in Slovenia) for a check-up even though nothing was aparently wrong with it. The REP said that they Will service the camera on this issue even if it is out of 1-year warranty as the issue is known to Ricoh - Pentax. It is a nice camera and have used it alot in recent months.
Marko
Greetings,
Thank you. That is good to know but I'm not sure how much to believe it if it isn't written in a warranty document.
Originally posted by zmohie Regarding the SR..k3ii has a better SR than k3. i have both ..the k3ii gives a sharper pics than k3. IMHO
Thank you, I guess you're the same member who told me about that on the article comments section. That is the only reason I went with the K3-II instead of K3. If you have time, do you think it would be possible to show it in examples?
Originally posted by stevebrot Send it back for a refund and purchase from a different dealer.
Steve
Yeah, I already requested a refund but I'm trying to decide between K3 and K3II and I'll get it from B&H this time. Thank you.
Originally posted by Adam Pentax's SR has been "good enough" for a very long time. It does its job.
With the low price of the classic K-3 it's well worth it in my opinion, though long-term it of course makes sense to spend more money on lenses than on bodies.
Thank you. It looks like you're almost sure that the SR in K-3 is the same or at least very similar to the one in the K-3II.
Originally posted by Fenwoodian I'm new to Pentax, and the K3II is the first Pentax camera I've owned. I like it better then my Nikon D7100 and my Fuji X-T1.
That said, I sent mine unit back to B&H for replacement because I had a bad serial number.
Indeed, I had intermitant lock ups due to the GPS problem. I rarely use GPS, but sent it in for replacement anyway, primarily because of my concerns on how this problem would likely also affect the ability to use the K3II's astro tracking feature (which I intend to try in August).
All I can say is B&H has a terrific returns policy, and I simply will never buy from anyone else because of that (and their friendly customer service reps).
I replaced my first camera but it didn't had any problem. The replacement has the higher serial number and it got the problem! That's what makes me lean to K3 instead. K3 had it's own problems too but it's been stable for a while now so they most likely got it right by now. Pentax seems to have a quality control issue. It is a small company and the return ratio seems high when compared to their sales. I'm not saying that other brands don't have issue, they probably have more units but compared to their sales, it makes more sense.