Originally posted by Mo I'd guess that they have a 12MP DSLR up their sleeve, but I'd rather see a 6MP with a proper mount and TTL support than another crippled 12MP.
Yes, exactly same here!
I imagined that some days later Pentax could make a K1000D, which only need to have following essential features, I think:
- CWA and Spot metering in an accurate manner!
- Traditional metal material like those of the K1000 film SLR
- Full K mount support (which should not be so expensive btw)
- traditional TTL support (not very expensive neither)
- Only a single central AF point is needed! (crossed or not)
Well, I think for the shortlisted features I list above, I do believe Pentax can make a cheaper but better camera, by saving costs for those unneccessary things which are of no use and inaccurate!
p.s. but shortsighted camera makers won't let their users to have better backward compatibility just because they want to sell new lenses and flashes! but why don't they think that if they could make a fully compatible body, they can expand more market and eventually their users still will buy more lenses and flashes??
Quote: From the site:
Since when are digital MF cameras not considered DSLRs?
What? Pardon? :-))