Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-25-2015, 04:27 AM   #76
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 437
Well the Nikon D800's are all using a Bayer Sony sensor so the Pentax ff camera output is likelying going to be similar.

To throw a spanner into the discussion a Sigma SD1 Merrill should output excellent landscapes with unique Foveon output that is arguably better than what a Bayer sensor is going to give you.

I am seriously considering a SD1 for something different rather than the ff although that is probably somewhere in my future as well.

Howie Be

11-25-2015, 05:57 AM   #77
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,703
QuoteOriginally posted by Mattox Quote
So basically with a 16-50 sdm shooting landscapes what would be the optimum f stop in your opinion based on past experience ??
osv like to throw absolute things and to me there also a difference between diffraction and the optimum for a lens design. Some lenses are better at f/4, most at f/5.6 and f/8 allow to often get better borders.

And from reviews looking at your 16-50 it seems to perform better at f/5.6 at 16mm but perform better at f/8 at 50mm. Anyway the difference between f/5.6 and f/8 is not big enough to bypass more important aspects like what apperture would give the best results artistically. If f/8 (or even f/11) help you get a long exposure shoot or get more deph of field, then so be it. If f/5.6 or even wider apperture allow you to keep more speed handled, then so be it.

From a pratical point of view on a K5 you have a bit of diffraction starting with f/11 but that's not really key. If you need f/11 for the deph of field, you should go for it. For f/8 to be really an issue diffraction wise would need a 50MP sensor.

From practical purpose if really ultimate sharpness was your objective, you would take shoot at a longer focal length and stich many together using a pano head. With this technique, even gigapixels worth of detail is possible. If you want to display your landscape shoot on a full wall with very high level of detail, this is not the mere 36MP of a D800 that will make the difference. You'll want 100, 200, 500MP !
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, gear, guys, increase, increases, iso, k-3, k-5, k5, landscapes, lens, nikon, photography, post, resolution, sharpness, tuscany, vs, workshop
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: FS: (Australia/Sydney) Pentax K5 focusing screens. Nikon K3 split prism, Canon ee-S Nuff Sold Items 2 10-16-2014 04:51 PM
Accidentally Put My K5's SDHC Card in My K10 - Did that ruin my photos? bearestir Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 6 06-09-2013 08:55 PM
DA21 against Sigma 10-20 (v1)? axl Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 12-29-2012 09:34 PM
Pentax Flash against Nikon D5100 alan deakin Visitors' Center 3 07-19-2012 08:57 PM
Is my wife's Nikon P&S Really Better than my K10D? yustr Pentax DSLR Discussion 67 01-10-2011 10:28 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top