Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-25-2015, 11:53 AM   #16
Site Supporter
6BQ5's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Nevada, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,109
I imagine it's pre-production prototypes ... but who knows except for ePhotoZine?

11-25-2015, 11:59 AM   #17
Pentaxian




Join Date: Feb 2015
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,529
Original Poster
I wasn't considering reviews from other than actual users who own the lenses. Reviews base on one sample of a lens is not as useful as a review from photographers with various expectations and use cases. I regularly check the reviews of the PF database. I look forward to read the reviews of people having already purchased the DFA24-70 and DFA150-450.
11-25-2015, 12:06 PM   #18
Site Supporter
kiwi_jono's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,085
QuoteOriginally posted by Rondec Quote
The problem right now is that my wife was shooting a wedding with it and set her camera down with it on and it fell and and damaged the lens so it is "in the shop" right now.
Oh dear! Hope thats not grounds for divorce!
11-25-2015, 12:16 PM   #19
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,243
QuoteOriginally posted by biz-engineer Quote
I wasn't considering reviews from other than actual users who own the lenses. Reviews base on one sample of a lens is not as useful as a review from photographers with various expectations and use cases. I regularly check the reviews of the PF database. I look forward to read the reviews of people having already purchased the DFA24-70 and DFA150-450.
I think Adam has a copy and has compared it to the FA 28-80 f2.8 and found that it was sharper with better contrast and flare control.

Pentax-D FA 24-70mm First Impressions Review - Hands-on Reviews | PentaxForums.com

I imagine a more full fledged review will follow down the road.

---------- Post added 11-25-15 at 02:34 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by kiwi_jono Quote
Oh dear! Hope thats not grounds for divorce!
Definitely not.

Actually her professional shooting funds our LBA. It's all fixable, just too bad that it had to be a brand new lens that was the one that got damaged.

11-27-2015, 12:03 PM   #20
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,040
QuoteOriginally posted by 6BQ5 Quote
I imagine it's pre-production prototypes ... but who knows except for ePhotoZine?
Ehhhhh, even Pentax is not stupid enough to send out unfinshed lenses and have results published online. There is no hint about a pre-production prototype. OK, maybe Pentax is stupid enough or needs a review channel to voice an opinion. In any case this is not a review of the production lens and closer to hot air than anything else.
11-28-2015, 02:51 AM   #21
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,703
QuoteOriginally posted by zapp Quote
Ehhhhh, even Pentax is not stupid enough to send out unfinshed lenses and have results published online. There is no hint about a pre-production prototype. OK, maybe Pentax is stupid enough or needs a review channel to voice an opinion. In any case this is not a review of the production lens and closer to hot air than anything else.
Actually they did it they sent some lenses for reviews and to some photographers like kenspo. Kenspo showed a few pictures, ephotozine reviewed it and noted for example that the AF was hit and miss.

"Focus accuracy with phase detection could be a little hit and miss, so care may need to be taken, especially when shooting erratic, moving and difficult subjects. The minimum focus distance of 1.2metres is fairly typical for a lens of this type."

While their review of the 150-450 was flawless.

Ironically, Pentax then decided to not release the lens and instead fix it. I don't think that ephotozine could have find that focussing issue if they where just based on specs sheets or didn't got a sample in hands. I don't think neither they have been paid by Pentax to say that.

We can criticize ephotozine but overall the review they did on the different lenses I own tend to match reality.

Last edited by Nicolas06; 11-28-2015 at 05:40 AM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dfa, dslr, fa, images, lens, lenses, photography, review, reviews
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A comprehensive listing of Pentax lenses & lens reviews! Adam Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 33 10-04-2017 03:56 AM
Difference between 645 FA and DFA lenses? prohtex Pentax Medium Format 12 09-27-2015 01:39 AM
Pentax Full-Frame, DFA* 70-200mm, DFA 150-450mm Announced Adam Pentax News and Rumors 544 03-14-2015 05:29 AM
DFA 100 macro's reviews Ash Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 14 09-21-2009 09:20 AM
New reviews of DA 18-250mm? beaumont Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 19 03-26-2008 03:20 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:41 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top