Originally posted by wildman I know the methodology leaves much to be desired but still it does give some idea of what the sensor is capable of.
The only way of getting an idea of what the
sensor is capable of without specialist equipment, is to compare it with another sensor, using the same lens.
It would be really excellent, if anyone has, for instance,
- a *istD
- a K100D
- a K10D
- and a K20D,
- and one of the better lenses
, and could take some (as far as possible identical) pictures with each for comparison, also taking all possible measures to ensure accurate focus and elimination of camera shake.
Then, assuming the lens itself had adequate resolving power, we could look at the 100% crops, and see actual differences in detail between what the different sensors could record.
Of course, the different processing that each camera does with what comes off the sensor means that all other things apart from the lens are not quite equal, but it would be a start.