I'm also coming from Sony DSC land, and went through exactly the same decision. I'd come to the conclusion that Pentax offered the best value, and I've found since I bought mine, that the way the camera works is also superior. The software's better, menu system, etc., than anything else I've seen. So I was making the same comparison, though I was also considering the S-2. I came to the conclusion that the K-50 was best overall value, but that's partially because I don't need GPS or flip-out screens - like those useless extras on a new car that do nothing but jack up the price. Weather resistance was a foot-stompin' must-have for me. One piece of advice, though, buy the body only not the "kit". The lenses that come with kits are made with plastic. Buy the specific lenses you really want. I did get a 50mm lens that's not WR, but that's basically a portrait lens that I wouldn't use on the trail. Watch for sales at B&H Photo. Overall conclusion: I just absolutely LOVE the K-50. I can't get over it. When I first started doing this stuff, the same level of camera and lenses would have cost over ten thousand bucks, and all the stuff I've bought, the K-50, three lenses, bag, filters, extra batteries, etc. etc., less than a thousand total. I read about how happy people are with the K-3 and much more expensive cameras, but I can't imagine the delta being worth the money, the K-50's such a terrific package. Did I mention that I like the K-50?
Last edited by Unregistered User; 01-17-2016 at 03:32 PM.
Reason: error correction