I'm sure I must be doing something really stupid here (wouldn't be the first time!), but let's see if anyone can shed any light...
The K3 is my main camera, day-to-day, but increasingly I use my old K5 backup - usually fitted with a lens of complementary focal length so I have a choice without having to switch out lenses. When the K5 was my main camera, I shot JPEGs. For the last year, or thereabouts, I shoot only RAW. My processing is done mostly in Lightroom 6 - I have other software I sometimes use once the basic image development is done, but Lightroom is used to optimise exposure, contrast, colour, noise reduction, sharpening, lens corrections etc.
Fairly recently, I've been doing a lot of low light (without flash) experimentation. What I'm finding is this... when I import my K3 images into LR, usually my exposure is fine but sometimes I'll have some clipping of shadows. However, I can - almost without exception - recover those shadows so that there is no clipping whatsoever (if that's my choice). With my K5 images, though, I'm finding that I often can't recover the shadows on all colour channels; hence, I'm having to over-expose - sometimes to the point where I'm introducing clipping in the highlights that wouldn't otherwise have been there.
What am I doing wrong, folks?
---------- Post added 02-06-2016 at 09:39 PM ----------
Originally posted by BigMackCam I'm sure I must be doing something really stupid here (wouldn't be the first time!), but let's see if anyone can shed any light...
I think I may have answered my own question... dynamic range of the K5 at high ISO, yes? I'd read that the K5's dynamic range was actually a little better than the K3's, but I assume this was based on lowest ISO settings?
Last edited by BigMackCam; 02-06-2016 at 02:39 PM.