Originally posted by Alliecat I got that, kind of, although I didn't know by how much it would be cropped. My lenses range from 19 to 300; my main lens is a 35-105. Maybe I'd use the widest-angle one more then.
Just remember to multiply by 1.5. So your 19mm will feel like a 28mm would feel on film. Your 35mm becomes a 52.5mm (which is actually about what Pentax 50s are, 52mm). Your 35-105 becomes a 52-160mm or so.
Quote: Ah, KEH! I knew there was another shop I'd looked at in the past besides BH, and had forgotten the name. Thanks.
I've been trawling around eBay for K5's, but will go have a look at reviews & prices for K10Ds.
Geez, the model numbers. You'd think a "100" would have more megapixels than a "10"...
Then the K-1 would have hardly any pixels at all?
Here's something that will help you see what is higher vs. lower end in terms of features/build, and what is older and what is newer:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Pentax_digital_interchangeable_lens_cameras Quote: I also looked at a K-x which has movie mode, which I might also make use of (currently using my wee Optio for movies and it's been very-much-used so I don't know how much life is left in it).
The problem with some entry level cameras like the K-x, K-r, K-m/K2000, K-200D etc, is that they have smaller pentamirror viewfinder - not just smaller but also dimmer. Newer entry models like the K-500 and the K-S1 don't have that problem, they have the same big pentaprism viewfinders that their more upscale siblings have. But on those models I mentioned, that is something to pay attention to, since you will want to focus manual lenses with your camera.
If you could swing a newer camera like the K-S2, it has the same great pentaprism as the K-3 series (which was upgraded from the K-5/K-30/K-50 prism). It also has a great sensor, Wi-fi, a tilt screen, dual wheels and other great features. For 499 which is what it is selling for right now, it is a whole lot of camera for little money. But if you can't swing that, an older K-5 will cost you around 300, and the K10D 100-150 depending on condition. All of these will give you good results and have nice viewfinders (for APS-C cameras - don't expect the same level viewfinder you are used to in your film cameras... only the K-1 comes close to that...)
Quote: Also I'd prefer to have one with a rechargeable battery so I'm not using tons of AAs. (Would you get much time out of rechargeable AAs?)
Back to the specs comparison page.
Thank you for the input
Appreciate everyone's comments.
Rechargeable AAs, if you get good ones, will last you longer than a regular camera battery, from what I heard. But I haven't used them so I don't really know... I just use regular batteries on my K-r, and the K10D doesn't take AAs.
And you are very welcome