Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-10-2016, 01:36 PM   #1
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mazowsze
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 53
K-3 II vs. K-S2

I'm considering K-3 II as upgrade of my K-S2, which would serve as backup body. Having read reviews and numerous threads at PF, I still have one question unanswered - will K-3 II offer significantly better image quality than my currect camera? I don't need dozens of AF points, as I use only central one in 'focus and recompose' mode. Pixel Shift is of limited use outside studio, but improved tonal and dynamic range would be useful. I also wonder whether sensor resolution (20MP) is limiting factor for following Pentax lenses: A 50/1,7 M 50/4 macro, 12-24, 16-85, and 100 macro WR. As I said, image quality is the only criterion. Of course K-1 offers top image quality, but I do not consider such purchase.

05-10-2016, 01:43 PM   #2
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 714
In a word "no" I doubt it.
05-10-2016, 01:44 PM   #3
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,959
The image quality is certainly a step up. You get 14 bit color depth instead of 12, a bit more resolution, and most importantly, an improved metering system that will get you better colors in low light.

That said, of you want a significant improvement, the K-1 is the way to go. Time to start saving, perhaps?

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

05-10-2016, 02:07 PM   #4
Pentaxian
johnmflores's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Somerville, NJ
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,004
No. In a double blind test you likely would not be able to tell the difference.

05-10-2016, 02:22 PM   #5
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,523
I can't say as I don't have a KS-2 to compare with - I have seen people who have done the comparison and came away saying the KS-2 was the better sensor. The likely situation is that you would be hard pressed to see differences.
05-10-2016, 02:55 PM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 817
I've compared the k-3 and the k-s1 directly. The white balance and colour accuracy of the k-3 makes editing the RAW files a little easier (also helpful in tricky lighting conditions). The high ISO noise of the k-s1 is better though (not massively, but it is noticeably better at 3200/6400). Really though, aside from pixel shift, there isn't a huge difference in image quality. The k-1 on the other hand - that is a big step up in image quality! I'd probably recommend saving up for a while longer and getting one of those...
05-11-2016, 01:58 PM   #7
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mazowsze
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 53
Original Poster
Thank you for these insights - looks like I have no other choice, but to spend money on better lenses, or even buy K-1 Anyway, K-S2 won't be replaced by K-3 II. Thanks again!
05-11-2016, 11:30 PM   #8
Junior Member




Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 28
I really like the K3 usability features like the 100% crop on review. I'm constantly zooming in with my KS2 to ensure sharpness and it kills me that I have to buy K3 to get this feature. The K3 has other features that I would love to have on my KS2. The K3 lacks the swivel screen and being from the new age of photographers, I love this feature as I use that rear screen quite a bit. Just wish it were a touch screen. Most of my mature photo experience has been with touch screens as they are easier to work with.

05-12-2016, 12:41 AM   #9
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,523
Re: touchscreen
I'm from the not touchscreen world and having difficulty getting used to touch screens. It should be easy but I'm so used to how I operate a camera. Lol
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, ii, image, k-3, k-3 ii, k-s2, macro, photography, quality
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax K-3 II, K-S2 and Ricoh GR II need your help! Class A Pentax DSLR Discussion 5 12-25-2015 09:13 AM
K-x upgrade - K-s2 kit vs. K-3 body? agraspar Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 12-21-2015 12:52 PM
K-3 vs K-3 II Shake Reduction mee Pentax K-3 11 12-02-2015 04:53 PM
K-3 vs K-S2 vs K-50 AlexL Pentax DSLR Discussion 41 08-09-2015 09:32 PM
K-5 II vs K-S2 Wingincamera Pentax K-S1 & K-S2 3 06-18-2015 08:22 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top