I have often thought how interesting it would be to use a very basic, but still capable DSLR.
In fact a kind of digital Super A. I skip the often heard desire for a digital K1000 or MX, as batteries are still needed, and some kind of Auto mode would be nice to have in case of a sudden occasion - you don't need to use it all of the time.
Of course, such a camera will never be offered. Keep in mind, that even in an enthusiast forum like this the potential buyers would be a minority, and sales would be so low that would cost a premium price.
But, what would I like to find in such a body?
- It should be SMALL
- It should be LIGHT
- Sensor in the range of 12-16MP (no matter whether APS-C or FF)
The first two are somehow related: removing all not absolutely needed energy consuming features could lead to a smaller and lighter battery.
There could be 2 models, the second (Super) would offer some additional things.
Both cameras would be WITHOUT
- AF (no motor)
- Shake reduction (thinner body)
- Live View and movie (energy)
- Flash
- Motors for mirror, aperture, and shutter. Instead, an electronic controlled mechanic shutter like in the Super A would be used. There would be a small lever to cock shutter/aperture lever. With the Super version a battery grip could automise cocking (smaller motor than with the winder of film bodies, as no film transport needed).
- WiFi
- GPS
Added features for both models:
- Pentamirror (Pentaprism for the Super model) with SPLIT SCREEN
- Small top LCD with only basic information
- Small (like *istD models) back LCD OLED display for using a minimum of energy
- Uncrippled (!) KAF2 mount; of the enhanced features of KAF2 vs. KA only the lens data for EXIF would be used (data pin). I am not sure whether to allow full usage of lenses without aperture ring, as it would probably mean one more wheel on the body. Without it, you could still use such lenses in Tv and A.
Mods/enhancements for the Super version:
- Prepared for usage of a battery grip, which also could provide a motor drive to auto cock shutter/aperture lever
- Pentaprism instead of Pentamirror
- WR
- Eventually (?) TTL; pTTL may not be possible if split screen makes matrix measurement too difficult, but I am not sure.
Because of WR and prism, it would likely be a bit heavier (and bigger?)
Of course, everything that can be integrated just by firmware could still be there - if it doesn't mean additional buttons, wheels and/or higher energy consumption.
As prices for FF bodies are generally higher compared with APS-C, a FF model may even sell better. And it would be extremely small for a FF!