Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-26-2016, 08:02 PM   #1
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Newcastle
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,548
K5iis versus K1 ISO range

Am I right in thinking that the minimum ISO 80 for the K5iis is inferior to the K1's ISO 100 on the basis of format differences? I ask this as I am contemplating which APS-C I should be selling (K5iis or K3).

I am leaning towards selling the K5iis as the K1 will more than adequately make up for the 'loss' of ISO 80. The K3 will be my main wildlife/ macro setup (focus peaking is another benefit over the K5iis).

Thoughts

06-26-2016, 08:35 PM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 43,032
The pixel pitch is roughly the same if you compare the two sensors. The newer chip in the K-1 offers better color depth and more dynamic range, though, so that should deliver superior pixel-level image quality and base ISO. The fact that you have more than twice the number of pixels then seals then deal

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

06-26-2016, 09:33 PM   #3
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,827
Two school of thought. One says each pixel on its own determines the performance based on pixel pitch and generation of sensor. The other school says total light on the sensor is most important. I think there is some truth to both.


As Adam pointed out the k-1 had nearly three same pixel pitch as the k5ii. The sensor is larger, and of a newer generation.
06-27-2016, 12:03 AM   #4
Veteran Member
sewebster's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 533
I guess the idea with the more pixel advantage is to display/print at any given resolution you can average more pixels to reduce noise...

06-27-2016, 12:11 AM   #5
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Newcastle
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,548
Original Poster
thanks guys. while I really love my K5iis it would seem I am not 'losing' by selling it after an upgrade to K1 (with a K3 as backup).
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, iso, k1, k3, k5iis, k5iis versus k1, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K3 AUTO ISO range Paul the Sunman Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 4 06-13-2016 10:46 PM
K1 Outdoor Macro Pixel Shift: ISO 8000 DDoram Pentax K-1 11 06-13-2016 03:45 PM
K1 High ISO for wildlife dlai Pentax K-1 7 06-07-2016 07:21 AM
K1 at High ISO dlai Pentax K-1 9 05-31-2016 07:27 AM
K-1 Full res JPGs versus D810 ISO 12800, ISO 51200 beholder3 Pentax News and Rumors 103 03-23-2016 01:24 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top