Originally posted by UncleVanya And does 60mm also look good? Someone was saying 60mm wasn't very good - I think they said < 100 and > 200 wasn't good (without the mod).
My guess - and it is ONLY a guess is that this baffle is related to the constant f/stop. I think without it the f/stop may be larger than f/4 at some focal lengths. I wish we could test two side by side easily.
i will try it later this week i am going to be tied up for the next couple days
---------- Post added 08-02-16 at 09:56 PM ----------
Originally posted by UncleVanya And does 60mm also look good? Someone was saying 60mm wasn't very good - I think they said < 100 and > 200 wasn't good (without the mod).
My guess - and it is ONLY a guess is that this baffle is related to the constant f/stop. I think without it the f/stop may be larger than f/4 at some focal lengths. I wish we could test two side by side easily.
the shots i took at f4 seemed to be exposed ok so i think even if is a little wider the meter would still read correctly whatever light was available. i have an old analog light meter and i will play with it and see how the readings compare with the camera meter.