Originally posted by taita87 It's a tempting choice but... Adapters aren't cheap. You also lose the smaller size of the 21 compared to like a fujinon 23 f2 which is almost the same focal length, water resistant, faster, and a good lens too
No, you're right. I think most of the time, adapting lenses comes at either significant cost or significant compromise. The DA21mm is a fantastic lens, my favourite of the limiteds (despite generally being regarded as the weakest of the bunch) and it pairs great with any of the APS-C K-mount bodies.
What led me to investigate Fuji was that the mirror-shutter mechanism on the K-30 has a hard, clipped character which makes it sound louder than it really is and, after putting a good few rolls through an old Olympus Trip 35, I had decided that there was a real benefit in being able to see outside of the frame for the type of photography I really like (hence X-Pro 1 and the OVF). I could have gone K-5/K-3, but they are both much more camera than I need and I didn't want the extra weight.
When I consider the original launch price of the X-Pro 1 + 23mm f2 Vs K-30 + 21mm limited, there's really no contest. Pentax wins on IQ:cost basis hands down, with virtually no compromises in any of the areas where it counts. I would say the K-30 even feels more robust than the X-Pro 1, despite it not having an all-metal construction.