Originally posted by zapp
When comparing two cameras for resolution why should one work with different lenses and point at moving targets...?
Btw. the whole DoF discussion is wrong as always. DoF does not scale linearly with focal length and pixel pitch is important to judge DoF. I am happy to assume that the APS-C rig did better - why, cannot be judged from the given setup.
The only way to understand DoF from a theoretical point of view is to look up what you're doing from a DoF chart.
But the practical thing is to say " I need more DOF, looking at your images and turning your aperture ring.
As for why the APS-c camera did better (or worse) in a given situation, that's for the experts. All I want to know is with the gear i have, what gives me the best image, and that is constantly being evaluated on an on going basis.
You have to know what is. You don't have to know why it is.