Originally posted by bertwert I see you've decided to get a K-1, I guess after seeing it in person it possessed you?
Have lots of fun with it!
See the K-1 thread for how that all developed, and how doubt turned to something more like certainty. I've been hemming and hawing for an age, let it go at Christmas, but decided there is no time like the present. Also, I knew that my regular February overseas conference would put me in a position to be able to handle one before I paid the large sum that it cost, so it was worth deferring until I could have the camera in hand. At first the size and heft was offputting, but after taking off the D-FA* 70-200 and putting the DA 18-135 back on, it no longer seemed quite so heavy. Definitely bulkier than the K-5 and will need getting used to, but I can see myself appreciating quite a few of its new features. Even if I only ever shot it in crop mode (which I guarantee you I won't), it would almost be worth it.
Mind you, local snowstorms will probably keep me waiting for a few days (though I would love to be proved wrong there), but after that... full-frame digital, here I come!!
I might add in reply to others that no upgrade
per se is needed here. I've had a K-5 for about five years now; it replaced a dead *istDL. The *istDS purchase was mostly to play around with analogue TTL on a digital body and to enjoy a bit of nostalgia for the *ist series. I can comfortably say that I have wrung the heck out of what's possible with these cameras, and anyone who finds themselves with one that works and is going cheap should give it a go, especially if they can find themselves an AF280T flash to go with it. From the POV of using pre-A lenses with flash, analogue TTL was and is a godsend; even with only 6.1MP on a CCD sensor, it just about turned the K-5 into a shelf queen. Such a shame that the original Pentax full-frame camera had such a dodgy sensor; if only Philips could have got that right, Pentax would have been a world-beater.