Originally posted by ffking DSLRs will never compete with smart phones in the weight category - rather concentrate on products that can do things smart phones can't do, and if that means weight (robustness, weather sealing, features such as IBIS) then so be it.
Where did i compare them to the smartphones? Just proper cameras. Nikon d7500 is just as feature packed as any of the Pentax current lineup and lighter (lighter than d7200 that was lighter than d7100, that itself was lighter than d7000).
Pentax managed to pull out a rather light DSLR - the K-S1. Design flaws aside - it would be nice to get back on that track - have a lightest DSLR with a proper pentaprism and 100% coverage on the market.
Making heavier and heavier cameras is not attracting any new customers by the way, and as i see it the Pentax user base is shrinking
---------- Post added 04-12-17 at 10:00 AM ----------
Originally posted by pakinjapan I prefer the build quality of K3. I am not sure about the build quality of D7500. I have never touch one yet. but I know I was looking at D7000 Vs K5 before I went with K5. D7000 gave me a plastic feel. not a cheap plastic but still plastic. K5 is a solid block of metal.
D7500
Weight: 720 g includes batteries
Dimension: 136 x 104 x 73 mm (5.3 x 4.1 x 2.9 in.)
K3II
Weight: 800 g includes batteries
Dimension: 131 x 100 x 77 mm (5.16 x 3.94 x 3.03in)
where did u get that quote from? D7500 is 640g inc batteries. D7500 is a properly made camera made to last. Just as K3 - they are targeting same user group after all...