Strobist's manual flash technique obviously works well for a lot of people. But it is not a solution to me. There is no such thing as one solution for all.
I
much prefer P-TTL, maybe I am the average guy [shrug].
I like P-TTL, I need High Speed Sync, I want the speed of flash setup using P-TTL, I want the total flexibility in choosing aperture and ISO without all the calculations, I prefer the P-TTL wireless multiple flash control where I can set the master:slave ratio right from my camera instead of attending and adjusting each individual slave flash.... and so on. P-TTL has worked well for me.
I am not saying which one is better, all I know is that P-TTL has worked better in my application. I would not preach one way or the other, and I would not suggest that there is one and only solution.
It is simply not helpful to sidetrack the whole thread just because of your own preference.
Originally posted by jfdavis58 And that's really sad because learning three simple lighting ratios and the sequence of f/stops and shutter speeds to the nearest 1/2 stop is the exact solution. (I'd be happy to point you at an EV table--but that's not average*
As to p-ttl being a rip-off: well, I've seen cameras with attached can/bottle openers--what am I to say about what the average consumer finds useful?
PTTL/TTL/AUTO/"insert other mindless technique" are good for average shooters on average days, shooting average scenes and expecting average results. I've never encounters such scenes and wanted these results, but to each his/her own.*