Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-31-2008, 08:35 AM   #46
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 168
I came to this thread somewhat late, having been away on a photo jaunt. I agree with what everyone says here, especially regarding the specific images in question. However, it's not always the fault of the camera operator. When one of my K10D bodies came back from Pentax (back-focus problem, amongst others), ALL the subsequent photos I took were consistently underexposed by about .7 stop, regardless of the meter mode, lighting, or subject matter. I have since dealt with that issue by routinely setting exposure comp. at +.7 and sometimes further tweaking the exposure in ACR. Before the camera went to Pentax, the exposures with this body were pretty much on the money.


08-31-2008, 06:04 PM   #47

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Valley of NY
Posts: 56
Original Poster
I would like to thank everyone for all of your help. I'm now shooting with P (MTF,) SV and TV modes using multi-segment metering with +0.7 exposure compensation and my pictures are much better now. I've also ordered the book Practical Artistry: Light & Exposure for Digital Photographers by Harold Davis.
08-31-2008, 08:14 PM   #48
Loyal Site Supporter
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 20,434
Great read, tips and technical help - amazing Forum! Lots of bookmarks for reading later.

Interestingly I have struggled with constant overexposure and blown highlights and sky with my K10D. DK why yet (but perhaps I can start to figure that out now) but my Q&D fix has been to use -0.7EV as a memory setting, shoot RAW and fix in PPB or PSE.
09-01-2008, 08:58 AM   #49
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
QuoteOriginally posted by monochrome Quote
Interestingly I have struggled with constant overexposure and blown highlights and sky with my K10D.
Generally speaking, matrix metering will only produce overexposure with blown highlights udner the most extremes of dynamic ranges - usually it just underexposes to preserve highlights. But center weighted metering (or spot) will certainly allow overexposed areas often enough if you center on a darker area of the picture.

I suppose matrix could blow out more highlights if you set the option to link AE point to AF point, and focus on a dark object.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, k10d, photography, pictures
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why FF didn't happen? octavmandru Pentax DSLR Discussion 14 11-03-2009 12:38 PM
Something will happen ... Mindaugas Post Your Photos! 15 03-30-2009 11:26 AM
It had to happen graphicgr8s General Talk 126 03-03-2009 11:02 PM
Why does this happen Fritzvds Photographic Technique 22 08-20-2008 05:32 AM
Now how did that happen? ftpaddict General Talk 11 05-13-2008 12:23 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:53 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]