Kind of a tough review. I would argue that we haven't seen any "revolutionary" products recently. 4K video has been around for awhile now. Increasing frame rates , even to 20 frames per second is only incremental improvement over past generations of cameras. Most people still do buy ILCs to shoot still photos and that is what hasn't changed much at all. Drop a K-1 and D810 and D850 and A9 image unmarked and you will be unable to tell them apart except if you happen to have used pixel shift on the K-1 image.
The K-P has tested to similar performance to the 6D MK II with regard to noise and dynamic range. That alone makes it pretty impressive to me. The difference in price between it and the K70 is 300 dollars, but of course, it is newer and has the option for an add on grip with better battery life as a result. That alone, while not innovative, puts the camera in a higher range than the K70 and would be a reason to choose it over the K70.
I hate these sorts of lists. It is one thing if there are really bad products out there, but there aren't. The 6D II doesn't bring improved image quality to the table over the 6D, but there are other improvements that would get Canonites to choose to shoot with it over the original 6D. Certainly picking on Pentax is any easy thing to do in any list.
Last edited by Rondec; 12-22-2017 at 03:31 AM.