Originally posted by Kevin B123 Just 20 more hours to go
. I'd be interested to hear of your impressions relative to the K-50 once you are settled in with the K-70. However I look at it, it seems a great camera.
It seems he will be settling in with the KP, not the K-70. I do believe he will notice differences, depending on the quality of lens used, it will then be more or less. I have had my K-5 IIs for several years now, which has a similar sensor to the K-50, but also has no AA filter, which is also true of the KP, yet I have noticed improvements in the KP that are over and above my K-5 IIs. That difference is potentially greater over the K-50, which still employs the AA filter. And there will be a much more advanced control set and feel in terms of the build quality.
I still do like my K-5 IIs, especially its having a different feel and a different advanced control set, and its image quality I still consider as very high. So I am keeping it for times when I need what it offers. If I were coming from a K-50 I might be thinking otherwise, although there's nothing wrong with having a 2nd backup body either.