Originally posted by steve_k it always comes down to value
Exactly correct. Value for money. The fact is that I am tight with my money. The term expensive probably does not mean the same thing to everyone. My view is that it does not have to be "expensive" to buy another brand, either as your only equipment, or as part of a dual system. I buy used equipment.
The key to buying well-priced used equipment is to be patient. A better deal will always come along. Another key to successfully buying used is to ask lots of questions about the equipment. Be knowledgeable about the equipment you want to buy. It is also in your favor to avoid buying 20 - $25 lenses, when you could have saved the $500 and bought the better lens you really wanted. Patience, patience.
Buy a generation or two behind the bleeding edge is another way to get value for money. Make the most out of the equipment you do buy. Has your skill really exceeded the capabilities of your current equipment? I sadly let go of my K-1 because of arthritis in my thumbs and hands. My Sony a7II and Sony FE24-70 F/4 cost less, used, than I sold the K-1 for. The K-1 and Sony a7II are like apples and oranges, not equal but different, both capable of creating most satisfactory images.
I realize not everyone would be happy buying used. There are good deals out there if you are patient. Case in point. Yesterday.... received a lens I have been lusting after for years....
the Pentax K50 f/1.2. My copy is excellent to mint, few signs of use. Glass is clear, and functions are smooth. Usual used price: mostly $325-400. My price, $208 + shipping. I was patient, looking for the better part of a year.
As always, YMMV. Sure, I miss the K-1. Do I regret using Sony? No way. Do I enjoy the vast selection of Sony, Pentax, Minolta, Konica, Canon, and Olympus lenses.You bet! If you lust after Sony, Nikon, Canon, or Pentax, it doesn't have to be expensive. My point is that there are choices.
.