Originally posted by kevingt01 I’m leaning towards a used K3. From things I’m reading I’d expect to notice some advantages over the K30. Is it right to assume a little more room to push the RAW images given 14bit, and possibly better auto focus and metering?
I went from two K-30s to a K-3 and a K-S2. Definitely better AF and metering with the K-3, robust construction and a host of little things (like Dust Alert, quiet shutter, dedicated ISO button, fast frame rate etc etc). The major limitation with the K-3, for me, is its mediocre high-ISO performance. The K-S2 is also better than the K-30; the AF and metering improvements aren't as great as with K-3, the shutter is noisy, grip is less comfortable, but the flippy screen and compact size are very useful and image quality is very good.
K-70 seems to have all the virtues of the K-S2 with a better grip and a few other goodies like PixelShift, better image stabilization, 14 bit RAW, etc:
https://tweaknhack.blogspot.com/2016/06/comparison-pentax-k-70-vs-pentax-k-s2.html Should be better high-ISO than the K-3, although the metering and AF won't be as good and the shutter will be noisier.
Last edited by Des; 06-11-2018 at 09:30 PM.