Originally posted by per Well the title says it all, would really like to hear peoples opinions. Have bought a cheap ist DS that Im giving to my GF, tried to sell my 18-55 and 50-200 but could not get a fair price so decided I was better of giving them away as a gift.
Fair gift or waste of money?
I'm a bit confused about the scenario here. You titled the thread, "backup camera or waste of money?" Are you giving the *ist DS to your girlfriend as a backup camera for her? Does she have another camera already?
I certainly think an *ist DS and a couple of lenses make a great gift for someone who doesn't have something better already. The *ist DS is a nice little camera. It's small (compared to the newer cameras) and takes nice photos, especially if you put a good lens on it. Nevertheless, I don't use mine much any more.
I bought my *ist DS originally as a backup for my K10D. I needed to get a backup because I made the mistake of selling my K100D when I upgraded to the K10D, and I got the *ist DS because I could not afford another K100D. I would rather have the K100D, if only for the shake reduction. True, shake reduction isn't always a huge deal if you can get close to the subject and keep the shutter fast enough to offset camera shake, but I certainly think shake reduction matters in many situations.
Now I have three cameras: the K20D, the K10D and the *ist DS. I don't really use the K10D now as my backup - I use it as a second camera with a different lens, right alongside the K20D. So I guess the *ist DS is still my backup, where "backup" means "the camera I'd use if something else broke." If I only need one camera, in many cases, I will grab the K10D or the K20D without thinking too hard about the difference. But I don't use the *ist DS much now.
Will