Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 13 Likes Search this Thread
07-22-2018, 07:08 AM - 1 Like   #1
Senior Member




Join Date: Jun 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 171
Do you even consider balancing your camera on a tripod?

I know for many that trying to get the tripod reasonably level and attaching the clamp to the head is often as far as many people go.

Isn't it better to ensure the camera is actually balanced on the (ball) head rather than just hoping that the clamps will keep it steady enough?

I recently got a k1 and i was surprised to find even with a small lens the camera balanced better with the body behind the clamp.

kind of like balancing a seesaw the lighter lens actually has more effect on the balance being further away than the heavier body.

I guess partly because the tripod screw is pretty much centred on the body the front half and back half counter each other.

I'm using a combination of L bracket and a nodal slide rail the L bracket helps balance left right and the slide rail front back.

I think it reduces vibration too being better balanced and no lens droop either. What do you think?

07-22-2018, 07:26 AM - 5 Likes   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,694
With Gimbal tripods heads balance is essential - the whole idea of Gimbal heads is to balance the weight of the camera to enable smooth fluid motion. 6kg of unbalanced camera on a Gimbal head is a great way to get smacked in the privates*. On a Ball head, I don't think it is that much of an advantage regarding stability and vibration damping - Zoom lenses shift the center of mass quite a bit, even primes with front focusing groups have a similar effect. Many lenses below 100mm lack tripod collars, this really curbs any attempt to balance the camera system: which will nearly always be skewed towards whichever end is heaviest. Using slide rails is a good idea in theory - but it also reduces stability and weight capacity of your tripod head can handle by raising the camera above the attachment platform and adding weight of its own.


* I have personally witnessed this, and I have to admit: it is always funnier when it happens to someone else.

Last edited by Digitalis; 07-22-2018 at 07:45 AM.
07-22-2018, 07:33 AM   #3
amateur dirt farmer
Loyal Site Supporter
pepperberry farm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: probably out in a field somewhere...
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 41,751
I stopped worrying about that when I replaced my last ball head with a 410jr.... would not want to go back...
07-22-2018, 07:41 AM - 1 Like   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,694
QuoteOriginally posted by pepperberry farm Quote
I stopped worrying about that when I replaced my last ball head with a 410jr...

I hear you, all but the most expensive and expertly engineered ball heads droop. I'm still using my Manfrotto 405 - it hasn't been serviced since I got it about 7 years ago.

07-22-2018, 07:44 AM   #5
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,445
Honestly I would think that a well balanced head would be less dampened than a loaded one. Any ringing in the system is likely to be dampened by the biased loading. At least that what I feel like should happen. You might try testing this by setting up the tripod and using both methods and then take some shots. If adventurous you could try to induce a repeatable vibration.
07-22-2018, 07:55 AM - 2 Likes   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,694
QuoteOriginally posted by UncleVanya Quote
I would think that a well balanced head would be less dampened than a loaded one
In a nutshell: Using an unbalanced load to disrupt the potential for resonance. Makes sense.
07-22-2018, 09:14 AM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
bobbotron's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ottawa, ON
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,349
I don't. I have a sturdy tripod, and the shots come out nice and crisp.

07-22-2018, 09:29 AM   #8
Senior Member




Join Date: Jun 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 171
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by UncleVanya Quote
Honestly I would think that a well balanced head would be less dampened than a loaded one. Any ringing in the system is likely to be dampened by the biased loading. At least that what I feel like should happen. You might try testing this by setting up the tripod and using both methods and then take some shots. If adventurous you could try to induce a repeatable vibration.
I went looking for articles
https://www.digitalrev.com/article/use-your-tripod-smarter

"10/ Find your centre
Longer, heavier lenses, like fast telephotos, shift your setup’s centre of gravity forward and this can quickly reduce the stability of your shooting position. An unstable position means camera shake, already pronounced in telephoto shots, increases, and of course there’s the possibility that everything could fall over if your tripod is poorly placed. To prevent this, always make use of a long lens’s tripod collar. It can feel like a pain to swap the quick release plate from camera to lens as you swap optics, but it’s well worth the trouble. Better yet, buy a second plate and leave that on the long lens’s mounting point. "

Why have lens collars if they don't help with getting a steady shot?
07-22-2018, 09:32 AM - 1 Like   #9
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,445
There ARE times I prefer to balance the lens and camera. Moon shots for example are easier if I don't have to fight the tripod every time I unlock it and it wants to tilt down - with a lot of magnification it is annoying to have to adjust the tension so high this isn't a problem so I prefer a more balanced position.
07-22-2018, 09:51 AM   #10
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 4,834
It depends. I rely on past experience with the camera+lens+ballhead combination. For example, the 15-30 is a heavy lens with no tripod foot. It has never caused my larger ballhead to droop. With my travel tripod ballhead, though, the lens can slowly sag downwards, so I tend to shift the camera backwards to balance the weight.


My most extreme off-balance situation was for the August 2017 solar eclipse. I was using a lightweight tracking mount to follow the sun at 500mm. This was a horribly unbalanced setup, and I worried about the camera falling to the ground, but careful trial runs at home showed that it was stable enough.

07-22-2018, 10:00 AM   #11
Senior Member




Join Date: Jun 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 171
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by UncleVanya Quote
There ARE times I prefer to balance the lens and camera. Moon shots for example are easier if I don't have to fight the tripod every time I unlock it and it wants to tilt down - with a lot of magnification it is annoying to have to adjust the tension so high this isn't a problem so I prefer a more balanced position.
Jobu make a thing called a hockey puck

Jobu Design Hockey Puck Counterweight JP-75G B&H Photo Video

Its about 4 -5 oz in weight designed to act as a counter weight to a big lens attaches to the tripod hole.

odd thing with the k1 is the left right balance ideally it would be under the axis of the lens but it feels like its to the right edge of the view finder even with an L bracket adding extra weight to the left side. I'm wondering if a longer base plate might be better or adding some counter weight. A lot of plates do have extra 1/4 screw holes.
07-22-2018, 01:30 PM - 1 Like   #12
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
StiffLegged's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2018
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,632
Aaarghhh, nooooo! Not more complications with tripod use! All the real experts agree the only way is to spend the price of a secondhand car on some exotic confection which will hold your camera and 800mm so tightly not even a nuclear explosion will disturb it, all the while allowing adjustment between ground level and further than you can reach using stilts.

Use something properly sturdy in both tripod and ballhead departments. Or cast a 1/4" screw end into a cubic yard of concrete – takes an earthquake to wobble it, but not terribly portable without a forklift truck.

Just kidding, I'm going back to bed now.
07-22-2018, 02:32 PM - 1 Like   #13
Pentaxian
cmohr's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Brisbane. Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,824
I personally always balance my camera and lens on the ballhead, it's really easy with a macro rail on there, and it is easier to make small movements to frame your pictures as the pivot point is not directly under the camera but at the balance point, there is less tightening needed on the friction as well, I can have my set-up move quite easily , make the tiniest movement and not have to tighten or loosen the friction, and it stays exactly where I leave it.


There's a few pictures of it here.

K-1 L-Bracket... My solution - PentaxForums.com
07-22-2018, 04:00 PM   #14
Senior Member




Join Date: Jun 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 171
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by cmohr Quote
I personally always balance my camera and lens on the ballhead, it's really easy with a macro rail on there, and it is easier to make small movements to frame your pictures as the pivot point is not directly under the camera but at the balance point, there is less tightening needed on the friction as well, I can have my set-up move quite easily , make the tiniest movement and not have to tighten or loosen the friction, and it stays exactly where I leave it.


There's a few pictures of it here.

K-1 L-Bracket... My solution - PentaxForums.com
That D850 bracket is quite something but so is the price.

PLND850 L-Bracket, Nikon D850, Arca-Swiss Type (L-Plate)
07-22-2018, 04:09 PM   #15
Pentaxian
cmohr's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Brisbane. Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,824
QuoteOriginally posted by blackest Quote
That D850 bracket is quite something but so is the price.

PLND850 L-Bracket, Nikon D850, Arca-Swiss Type (L-Plate)
NOt much more than the Mestos at the end of the day, but the only solution that lets me open the battery door on the grip without having to take anything off. I have also put a coldshoe on the upright, and slid it out, and it makes a fine flash bracket.

cmohr
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
body, bracket, camera, clamp, dslr, front, half, lens, photography, rail, slide, tripod

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your vehicle: what do you have, why do you like it, and what do you not like? Auzzie-Phoenix General Talk 2980 04-12-2024 05:06 PM
What do you consider the best Pentax for sports and fast moving subjects????? Gold Coast Pentax DSLR Discussion 28 05-30-2018 08:08 PM
What do you consider to be the sharpest Pentax 645/67 lens in your kit? Thomasbrowphoto Pentax Medium Format 52 07-18-2015 05:07 AM
Why would you even CONSIDER the Lowepro Slingshot 100?? Silverkarn Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 10 10-26-2010 09:43 AM
Do you leave your tripod Quick Release Plate screwed in to your camera? maconmatt Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 43 09-24-2009 05:45 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top