Originally posted by WMBP I agree with you that the results produced by the Sto-fen Omnibounce are not very exciting. The only thing I can say in its favor is that it's easy to use, because it has no options and there's really not much to think about. With the Omnibounce on the flash, I generally just point right at the subject and fire away.
If you just point Omnibounce type modifier right at the subject, you're just totally missing the whole conception of this device. It works when it's BOUNCED. The whole idea is to send the light all around the flash and reflect it from walls and ceilings, so it can fill its own shadows. If you send too much light directly into the subject it's not gonna work, because fill in effect will be to low and you'll get just a small, harsh light source. There is almost exactly the same thing with Lightsphere type diffusers - basically, if you point it right at the subject you're not getting the effect it's designed for (you're getting slightly bigger, ie. softer, light source with Lightsphere though). And another thing is that these types of modifiers are completely useless outside - they need walls and ceilings to work.
Speaking about amber Omnibounces for 540FGZ, I was using one of those Canon versions (I don't remember a model) - they fit good enough. The problem I had was that I used it to balance the flash for tungsten and amber Omnibounces are very similar to a CTO gels - they are giving too much magenta on a skin with a K10D in my opinion. For me, the best gel to balance 540FGZ on K10D for tungsten is Rosco Straw Tint. And talking about gelling flashes and Omnibounces - I'm pretty happy with Lumiquest Ultrabounce with Lumiquest FXtra gel holder loaded with Rosco gel samples. Very convenient combo.