Originally posted by Trickortreat Too bad samsung didnt continue that line.
It takes a much higher sales volume to justify manufacturing a new camera line than to keep an existing product line in production, but the only conclusion that can be drawn from the Galaxy NX (and the entire NX system) is that sales were never high enough to justify Samsung's investment in it. I highly doubt a more powerful version of Android OS would have saved NX. Following WWII, there were all kinds of variation on camera design and more recently, we saw a number of different variations in the first 12 years of the 21st century. Compact digital cameras (fixed lens) were selling at a rate never before seen in the photographic industry and with a lag of only a couple of years, SLR sales followed suit. By 2013, compact camera sales were losing lots of ground to smartphones and DSLR sales were past their peak. Since then, the high disposable income portion of the DSLR market has been looking for something to keep spending money on, but the mass consumer market is gone, probably for good. That's only five years ago.
The remaining camera buyers have years and years of experience using SLRs (digital and film). They want to spend money on things that are different from what they already have, but not too different. Going to a 100% touchscreen interface is too different. Going to a size and form that is awkward to hold in two hands is too different. Going to a lens mount that doesn't allow for the use of already owned lenses is too different. MILC's in conventional forms aren't too different, but unless they transform the experience of taking photographs in a positive way, they are never going to displace SLRs completely and their owners will soon start looking for something else that isn't too different. The SLR has survived more than half a century of new variations on the theme of a camera, it's not going away anytime soon.