Originally posted by Jonathan Mac I too find that these two systems work well together, with the strengths of one making up for the weaknesses of the other. If I had to sell stuff off I'd keep a Fujifilm body (not sure of the M1 or T20) and the 35/1.4.
It's interesting that you found the K3II (same sensor as K-3) is better than the X-T1 (same sensor as X-M1) in low light. I have found that my X-M1 has significantly better IQ at high ISOs than my K-3, though it may struggle to focus occasionally when light is low.
Well, every night sky photo I did with the K5/K3 came much better than the X-T1.
Take a look at this one made with the K5-II
I agree with you, both systems can coexist
For example, I prefer the XT1 than the K3-II for "urban travel" just because it's way lighter and more discrete.
But the Pentax are much tougher.
For light travel, I'm using two cameras, Panasonic LX100 and GX7
Depends a lot on what you need or want.
Oh, one thing I hate so much about some Fuji lenses is the aperture control ring.
It's obviously a nice feature, but it's too easy to change the aperture by mistake and the "A" position has no lock.
Several times I was using aperture priority ("A" position on aperture ring) and changed it to F16 by accident.