Originally posted by biz-engineer - medium format photographer likely put more efforts into each of their shots, the content of photographs is usually compelling, telling a story, people etc.
- medium format photographs are well exposed most of the time, subjects are generally well lit
- and also, especially in the Pentax K1 groups, a number of still photographs out not focused correctly (the subject doesn't move, there is no excuse for the photographer..)
I think most of your findings are more related to the group of photographers who own the camera and less to the sensor size of the camera itself.
Apart from the, as I suspect, much higher total number of full frame camera owners relative to medium format. You will find far more novice and amateur photographers whose equipment outperform their skill in the full frame section than with the medium format cameras, simply because of the premium price tag. I am certain there are some techies owning a 645Z too, whose skill level doesn't really justify such an investment, but I expect this group to be smaller relative to the more economical full frame sector.
Originally posted by biz-engineer - (more frame rate = more photographs that lacks anything interesting)
Since a high frame rate primarily is important or usefull for sport or wildlife photography (you may find that boring
) and not photography in general, I expect the high quantitiy of 'bad' pictures has more to do with the higher quantitiy of people owning those cameras